Category Archives: Accountability

Hotel Dispute Hearing Public Notice

Posted on by

The public notice sets out all necessary details to view the October 6, 10:00 am hearing regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment application council approved in May for the boutique hotel at 256 Dalhousie.

From the OLT: Please note that as per Rule 22.5 of the Ontario Land Tribunal Rules of Practice and Procedures, recordings of hearing events – photograph, motion picture, audio, video, or otherwise – is not permitted unless the presiding Tribunal Member authorizes the recording. However, approval would be subject to conditions that no distribution or public re-playing of the recording occurs, and it does not constitute an official transcript of the hearing or a record for use in any subsequent proceeding. Additionally, as per section 29 of the Statutory Powers Procedure Act, persons found improperly recording hearing events before the OLT and/or distributing those recordings may be liable to a fine of up to $25,000.

Regional Garbage Plan Dumped

Posted on by

What a waste. There were some long winded speeches during the Amherstburg town council meeting that resulted in the predictable 4-3 vote. Councillor McArthur mentioned ‘economies of scale’ five times; Crain once. Meetings would be more efficient if members would refrain from sharing personal anecdotes – do we really need to know the mayor freezes fish heads or what a councillor’s favourite coffee is and his thoughts on disposing of coffee cups? And, wouldn’t it be so refreshing if staff just answered yes or no to a question? Even better, can members just ask a question without a speech?

To move forward a majority of town councils had to vote in favour. Last night LaSalle and Lakeshore voted no, joining no votes from Essex and Kingsville. Amherstburg, Leamington and Tecumseh voted in favour.

How To Complain About Your Municipality

Posted on by

The Ombudsman OntarioEvery municipality states every municipality should have a general complaint policy approved by council and posts a brochure titled, Tips for Municipal Complaint Resolution Policies. I was unable to find an Amherstburg Municipal Complaint Resolution Policy on the town’s website.

What is a complaint?
The Office of the Ombudsperson broadly defines a complaint as: An expression of dissatisfaction made to or about a public organization about some aspect of its programs, services or people where a response is explicitly or implicitly expected.

In the local government context, it is important to distinguish between a bylaw complaint and other complaints about the way their services are being delivered to the public. Most local governments have established processes for responding to bylaw complaints—enforcing bylaws and responding to bylaw complaints is a central part of a local government’s role. However, it is also in the best interests of all local governments to have an effective system in place to handle general complaints and concerns from the public apart from bylaw complaints.

Ontario ombudsman

The Ontario Ombudsman is an office of last resort so the first step is to complain to the municipality, the CAO for example and, if not satisfied, then complain to the Ombudsman by filling in a simple online complaint form.

Council Questioned On Procedural By-law

Posted on by

On September 24, I emailed questions to all members of council.

Councillor Pouget emailed CAO Critchley this morning, These are all very good questions and I for one, would appreciate answers to them, concerning our new procedural by-law.  When time permits, will you or one of your staff please respond to all copied in this email?

Critchley answered the questions this morning.

the burg watch: how was it determined that Mr. Bolger will be a ‘presentation’ at the September 25 council meeting instead of a ‘delegation’ when presentation is not defined in the by-law and he will be speaking to an agenda item like a delegate? 

Critchley: A “presentation” is a form of a delegation and so the rules for delegations apply equally. Mr. Bolger registered within the time frame set out in the Procedure By-law and notice of the delegation was made public with the revised Agenda which was posted on Friday.

the burg watch: please explain the stipulation that a unanimous vote is required for council to waive the rules to allow audience members to speak freely.

Critchley: The new Procedure By-law has been changed to state that Agendas will now be posted publicly 10 days before a Council meeting. With this change, members of the public have ample time to review the Agenda and determine if they wish to register as delegations (by noon on the Friday preceding the meeting). Given this expanded timeline, there should be very few situations where someone cannot register to delegate in a timely manner. As such, there is now a rule that there must be a unanimous vote of Council to waive these rules. I would note that having procedures around delegations is a normal part of public meeting management that reflect municipal best practices, and that they are needed in order to run an orderly and professional meeting.

the burg watch: did members give any consideration to ontario human rights code accommodations of persons with disabilities when voting to approve the new by-law?  

Critchley: I cannot speak to what each member of Council considered when voting on the new by-law. However, I will say that, had any member asked if the new rules complied with the Ontario Human Rights Code, I would have advised them that it does. There is nothing in the new rules that would prohibit a person with disabilities from registering as a presentation or delegation and the Town’s Procedure By-law is in keeping with municipal best practices. 

the burg watch: on what date did members of council give direction to admin to update the by-law?

Critchley:  August 14, 2023

the burg watch: and, since my september 8 email has not been answered, would you please describe the procedure for delegates to council meetings regarding items that do not appear on the agenda?

Critchley:  By “items that do not appear on the agenda” I am assuming you are referring to items raised during “new business”. Should a member of Council raise an item at this portion of the meeting that someone wishes to speak to, Council can direct that a report on the item be prepared for a future meeting and delegations will be able to register to speak to those items in accordance with the Procedure By-law.

the burg watch: The by-law should have defined presentation and the public should have been consulted during the draft stage, a best practice other municipalities utilize. Nowhere can I find the ‘unanimous’ rule; and obviously, you cannot speak to what each member of council considered when voting. My questions were addressed to the members who, as you all know, are mandated to ‘develop and evaluate the policies and programs of the municipality.’

Comparing Procedural By-law Delegate Rules

Posted on by

The Town of Amherstburg’s newly adopted procedural bylaw seems more restrictive than it used to be.

When Mayor Prue noticed a raised hand at the September 11 council meeting, he stated a unanimous vote was required to allow Mr. Amlin to speak.

Section 5, Introduction, states: Any procedure under this By-law which is discretionary and not mandatory under statute may be suspended with the consent of a majority of the members present.

Section 14.5, CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS states: The rules of procedure may be suspended by a unanimous vote of Council and shall be time limited and specific.

  • Town of Essex If a Delegation is not registered with the Clerk, and Council, by a two-thirds vote of the Members present at the Meeting, gives the Delegation permission to address Council, the Delegation shall only address Council with respect to an item on the published Agenda.
  • Town of Kingsville offers residents choices to submit a request or make a written delegation instead of speaking (a procedure that I asked our municipality to establish). Also, for the Committee of the Whole, the Chair may relax the procedural rules to facilitate informal discussion as between the public, Staff and the Members, including but not limited to relaxing the rules related to delegation speaking time and registration.
  • Town of Lakeshore written request prior to the council meeting; if no application made, may be heard on a 2/3 vote of Council to speak an agenda item and have options to appear: In-person; computer or smart device or phone.There are also separate Rules for Public Presentations (a person or group wishing to present new items not on the Council meeting agenda).
  • Town of LaSalle has separate rules for Delegations – Items on the Agenda – written request by noon at least 4 days prior to the meeting; Delegations – Public Meeting -not required to provide advance written notice of their intention to speak; Delegations – Items Not on the Agenda – submit a written request as outlined in Section 9.2 by noon at least 21 days prior the Meeting; Delegations – Presentation – certain partner and external Persons may be granted presentation status in order to inform Members of matters of significance to the Town. noteworthy: the table of contents links to the sections.
  • Town of Leamington offers choices: Delegates can notify the clerk prior to the agenda or can request to delegate to address an item listed on the agenda or if not listed on the agenda as a delegation may request permission at the council meeting to address Council which may be granted upon a resolution of council members.
  • Town of Tecumseh Persons desiring to verbally present information on matters of fact or make a request of council, shall give written notice to the Clerk seven (7) days in advance of the meeting at which they wish to appear; shall state the topic to be discussed and any request to be made of the members. noteworthy: It shall be the duty of the Clerk to ensure that the minutes of the last regular meeting and all subsequent special meetings held more than three (3) days prior to a regular meeting, are placed on the next following regular Council meeting agenda.
  • Strathroy-Caradoc Right of Public Input and Notice The public has the right to have input and receive Notice of the public decision-making process. The methods for doing so include: writing to the Clerk or Secretary, submitting a petition, or speaking as a Delegation. Should an individual wish to be provided with further Notice related to a matter of business, they are required to indicate this wish to the Clerk or Secretary on the prescribed form; Anyone requesting to address the Members on an item that is not on the agenda may do so at the sole discretion of the Chair; Delegations in person may be permitted at the discretion of the Chair.
  • Scugog A delegation not listed on the agenda requires at least a Two-Thirds Majority of the Members present.
  • Lincoln The Clerk provides the Chair with all requests to delegate submitted after the deadlines for Council consideration; a majority vote is required to permit the delegate to speak.
  • Owen Sound A person may ask a question of the Members on any matter during the Public Question Period portion of a meeting.

Inconsistencies: When Is A Delegate Not A Delegate?

Posted on by

The September 25 council meeting supplementary agenda is for one item: a Presentation – Re: Item 13.2 Street Naming – Brittany Crescent and Stone Street – Norbert Bolger; there are no attachments.

The September 25 revised agenda lists the same item, also without attachments.

The newly adopted Procedural By-law (August 14) definitions include: “Delegation” means a person intending to address the Council or committee on a matter where a decision of the Council may be required.

‘Presentation’ is not defined but ‘delegation’ is and section 9.4 clearly sets out the ‘rules’ for delegations.

9.4  Delegations during other proceedings of Council or Committees are permitted in relation to matters listed on the agenda stemming from all Administrative reports and by-laws; in accordance with the following:

a)  Persons wishing to delegate at any Council or Committee meetings, shall advise the Clerk, no later than the Thursday before the meeting. Delegations shall provide their name, contact information, association with any organization (if applicable and the agenda item to be addressed);

b)  Delegation requests will first be reviewed to determine if it is merely seeking information and if so, will be directed to the appropriate member of Administration for a response;

c)  All delegations shall indicate the item on the agenda they wish to speak to, what action they wish the Assembly to take and shall provide a copy of any material intended for public distribution;

d)  Delegations appearing before Council, who have previously appeared before Council on the same subject matter, shall be limited to providing only new information in any subsequent delegation request.

Since Mr. Bolger will be speaking before council ‘in relation to matters listed on the agenda stemming from all Administrative reports,’ why is he a ‘presentation’ and not a ‘delegation’?

Minutes Need To Be Corrected

Posted on by

The September 11 minutes, attached to the September 25 agenda contain errors:

CAO Critchley is noted as being present, however Mayor Prue stated she was on vacation and Deputy CAO Osbourne was seated next to Prue where Critchley usually sits.

Motion Flooding

Councillor Pouget’s motion was to direct administration to provide Council with a complete report, regarding the recent flooding issues in Amherstburg and administration’s recommendations related to flooding control, including the possibility of any necessary upgrades to our sewage treatment plant and/or pumping stations, and the possible installation of any generator(s), if required.  We are requesting this report prior to the 2024 budget deliberations. Before it was carried unanimously, Prue called on the clerk.

clerk: The only thing I was going to add is when the mayor approached us regarding this, we had prepared a motion. I understand you have a motion as well. The motion would have read Council direct administration provide a report regarding the recent flooding event of August 23 and 24 with recommendations related to flooding control, including any upgrades municipal drain pumping stations affected by the recent flooding event. This report is to be brought to council prior to the 2024 budget deliberations. So I think it captures the spirit of what you’re intending as well.

The minutes state what the motion would have read: Council direct Administration TO PROVIDE a report regarding the recent flooding event of August 23rd and 24th with recommendations related to flooding control, including any upgrades to municipal drain pumping stations affected by the recent flooding event. This report is to be brought to Council prior to the 2024 budget deliberations.

What’s omitted? complete report, sewage treatment plant, and the possible installation of any generator(s).

Listen to the audio.

Motion Boblo Dock

Councillor Pouget moved: To direct administration to correspond with the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries to request the immediate removal of the old Boblo Dock in the Town of Amherstburg, due to safety concerns in one of the busiest waterways, the Detroit River.  Further to that, we are requesting administration to provide photos to back our fears of a section of that dock breaking off and causing serious injury or impeding boat traffic in the shipping channel, before inclement weather sets in. 

The motion read aloud was:

To direct administration to send a letter and photos to the Honorable Chris Lewis, to ask a question of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans during discussions to understand why the former Boblo Dock has not yet been removed. Carried Unanimously after Prue stated he’s not honourable.

The minutes state:

That a letter to Chris Lewis, MP BE SENT to request that a question is asked in the House of Commons to the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans in regards to the Bob-Lo Dock.

What’s omitted? photos.

This isn’t the first time minutes have been erroneous.

Related: Should Minutes Be Consistently Corrected?