My defamation lawsuit against the town clerk and town of Amherstburg followed my January 2022 critique of the draft multi-year accessibility plan.
Some of my answers to the multi-year accessibility plan survey questions that I completed in January 2026 are missing from the documents and verbal report on the survey findings.
Memorable Meanderings:
Shirley Prue said she’s intrigued about the federal standards; “took only 20 years but there you go.”
(As I keep pointing out, Mayor Prue stood up in the provincial legislature just over 20 years ago to vote in favour of the AODA. In 2025, he said this town has not been compliant).
Tony Pietrangelo asked, “where are the definitions as to what a public space is and a private space is? Where is that definition? Is there a standard that’s put out by the Government of Ontario?”
(The Design of Public Spaces Standards under the AODA were enacted on January 1, 2013).
Centennial Park redevelopment
Council already approved option 1 at its February 23 meeting so Heidi Baillargeon presented a recap on zoom:
- consultations with the tennis club, sports organizations, and North Star High School. (no mention of mandatory consultation with people with disabilities).
- two dedicated tennis courts and two basketball courts, with one set of tennis courts fully fenced and the other non-fenced.
- A multi-use trail, accessible parking spaces, and tree planting are also part of the design, with a focus on maintaining Russell Renaud Hill.
- The design includes rest stations every 100 meters, with some as close as 50 meters apart, and connections to accessible parking spots near the tennis and basketball courts.
Baillargeon mentioned the intention is to start the build in the winter for a spring completion.
Tony Pietrangelo gave Baillargeon his blessings and asked if the parking lot would be paved. Baillargeon explained only the accessible parking spaces would be paved – the rest will remain gravel.
(So, a million dollars for courts and yet another walking trail but people with disabilities will still encounter barriers trying to navigate through a parking lot. Priorities).
Pietrangelo asked what was budgeted for the project. Councillor Donald McArthur said it was just over a million.
Chris Drew said, I think you guys did a fantastic job. He mentioned some criticism about the trail system, but he thought the people in the area need that. He said a lot of them don’t have any way to get out to the Libro and they don’t have a way to get to the green away trails.
(The criticism I saw was related to the fact that over a million dollars is being spent on another amenity like a walking trail while infrastructure is crumbling, there are sidewalks to walk on, and sidewalks and roads are in desperate need of repair).
Baillargeon provided more details. The trail length is around 800 meters in total, 2.4 metres wide. Bench station spacing is an average maximum of 100 but the average spacing in this design here is around 75. We have 10 benches in total around the trail, with a cross slope is 2% on the trail. So that’s 2.5 inches in 10 feet. The parking spaces: four type A parking spaces 3.4 metres wide for a van, ten Type B parking spaces 2.4 metres wide for a car with a 1.5 metre wide shared aisle between the spaces.
Prue said we always think about, how do we get onto the trail if we’re in a chair.
(Maybe Prue should spend more time thinking about all the barriers in town that prevent people with disabilities from equally participating. Mayor Prue, her husband, did say in 2025 this town has not been compliant. That’s right – the town failed to meet the January 1, 2025 AODA deadline).
Accessible On-Street Parking Space
Prue said okay, 7.2 accessible on street parking space. What’s that one about?
(The agenda description is an aerial of Briar Ridge. The committee discussed this at the January 22 meeting: create an accessible on-street parking space at Briar Ridge Park, for approximately $500 for paint and signage and conduct public consultations for on street parking. This was to be one of the highlighted projects during National AccessAbility Week).
The committee was advised that the traffic by-law would need to be amended to have parking only on one side.
There seemed to be some confusion about where people would park and if they would be exiting their vehicle onto grass.
Multi-Year Accessibility Draft Plan and Survey Results
Prue said, okay, moving on to 7.3, which is the multi-year Accessibility Plan, draft. What you got?
(Just like her husband, she hands items over to staff. The meetings are for members to discuss items; staff should only be called on for clarification).
Admin said at a high level, the survey was successful in promoting some discourse in the community.
(I wonder how success was measured. I saw percentages, one document with pie charts and another document with bar graphs. It was later revealed that 17 people participated. Given the approximate 6400 Amherstburg residents with disabilities, that’s a poor result in my opinion).
Admin continued – if results indicate there’s some dissatisfaction there may be further need to refine and focus on those areas to understand what those concerns are.
(There was plenty of time to refine questions because the multi-year plan wasn’t due until December 2026).
Admin said responses were received from a variety of individuals, including people with disabilities and caregivers, although no breakdown was given.
(There should’ve been a breakdown given because the question was, ‘Do you wish to identify as… a person with a disability. The percentages indicate eight people identified as a person with a disability).
Admin then reviewed the survey questions and answers.
(Not all the answers; I noticed some of mine were missing).
Do the Town parks, including multi-use paths and trails, playground structures, and other amenities, meet your accessibility needs?
Admin said generally, they seem to be meeting the need for a vast majority of the respondents (11 people) but 25% (4 people) said no.
Admin said now that they know, they can use that to guide some of the focus of further inquiry on the plan.
(The questions should’ve been more comprehensive now. Again, there was plenty of time to refine questions because the multi-year plan wasn’t due until December 2026).
Have you encountered barriers at any Town parks, trails, or amenities?
38% (7 people) said yes.
One survey document does not list the barriers.
Another survey document lists top barriers:
- Parking
- Pathways
- Rest areas
Admin echoed the barriers that were identified were parking, pathways and rest areas. And, since the committee just discussed those items in Centennial Park, the conclusion was, ‘it seems like the committee is focused on the right things in that regard. And what we’re hearing from the respondent survey is that that’s where the attention should lie.’
(Should the focus really be based on seven responses?).
Does town recreation programming meet your accessible needs?
Once again, admin said that’s where more refined questions around what sort of programming is missing out. Admin mentioned sledge hockey and the Miracle League.
Do the town sidewalks meet your accessibility needs?
About 24% (4 people) said no. Reasons: the age and design of the infrastructure or maintenance standards.
Do the transportation options available in Town meet your accessibility needs?
The question about what would enhance the accessibility of transportation options within the Town wasn’t reported on or included in the reports. Again, admin mentioned further future questions to find out more.
A couple of questions about customer service: 12% (2 people) used the accessible customer service kiosk in the past year; of those that use them, 100% (2 people) said that they did meet their accessible needs. Admin said that’s a significant finding, it indicates that the kiosks are currently meeting the need.
(The kiosks are currently meeting the need of two people; that’s not a significant finding or indication that it’s accessible to the disability community).
How do you access information shared by the Town?
76% (13 people) use the town website, 76% (13 people) use the town social media, and 53% (9 people) word of mouth.
Pietrangelo asked how many people took the survey.
Admin said 130 people interacted with the talk the burg site, 61 accessed the areas that have the survey, only 17 of them completed the survey.
Pietrangelo emphasized the difference between percentages and real numbers. He wondered why they don’t get more people participating, especially under 18 years old.
Admin said if a barrier affects one person, they have that same standard to meet it.
(But the number one complaint in the residents’ OpenAir survey is accessibility and nno meaningful action was taken).
Pietrangelo asked who designed the questions and was told the communications team.
Drew said one thing that bothers him is these open houses are made available, surveys are made available, and people sit at home and don’t bother to do anything, but then they come out of the woodwork later with all kinds of stuff, like the Centennial Park. People are coming out saying, oh, they should be putting a swimming pool in, they should be doing putting a splash pad in, they should be doing this, they should be doing that; they don’t need the walking trails and stuff like that. Where were they when we had these open houses and the surveys for them?
(Drew also complained on my facebook page, saying most people are too lazy or don’t care).
Instead of blaming or shaming, the committee should’ve reviewed where the survey was advertised, how many times, and asked if there were any barriers to participation. I did point out to admin that if surveys can be emailed out, they should be able to email them back instead of having to take them in person to the town hall).
Prue asked if there were any other questions.
(It would be so refreshing to have decorum at meetings).
Projects and Initiatives in the Accessibility Plan
- Admin outlined the projects and initiatives in the multi-year accessibility plan, drawn from existing documents: the town’s seven-year capital projects, transportation master plan, and parks master plan.
- The plan will be open for public feedback and will be revised based on the committee’s input and the survey results.
Admin mentioned the federal standards. Prue said she’s intrigued; took only 20 years but there you go.
(As I keep pointing out, Mayor Prue stood up in the provincial legislature 20 years ago to vote in favour of the AODA. In 2025, he said this town has not been compliant).
Unfinished Business and New Business
- Admin provided updates on unfinished business, including the funding for accessible parking spaces at the Libro and Briar Ridge.
- The committee discussed the donation of a temporary accessible ramp to the Co-An Park Board for use at their stage.
- The motion to donate the ramp passed, and the committee agreed to review the multi-year accessibility plan and provide feedback at the next meeting.
- Meeting adjourned.







