The Burg Watch: Why I Stand Up for Our Community

Featured

Posted on by

As Amherstburg’s first local blogger since 2011 and creator of the burg watch, my goal has always been to keep our community informed. 

Through the burg watch I challenge the status quo because our community deserves better than the minimal efforts and performative gestures like promoting proclamations and raising flags.

A truly inclusive community removes barriers that prevent people from equally participating in their own community.

I’ve written about the barriers that need to be removed to end the exclusion. For example, the lack of accessible amenities like infrastructure, recreation, and civic engagement.

My disability rights advocacy isn’t a political hobby; it’s a commitment to a human right to belong.

Standing up for what I believe in and trying to hold our administration and council accountable has resulted in pushback and isolation. But I’d rather face criticism for defending our community’s right to equity than be liked for staying silent while residents are excluded from their own town.

I am proud of the conversations the burg watch has generated. I’ll continue to watch, write, and advocate—because a stronger, fully accessible Amherstburg benefits the entire community.

I appreciate the friends and allies that have joined me along this journey.

graphic image of brown wooden sign with white text that reads welcome to Amherstburg - a community for everyone with greenery at the base of the posts.
graphic image of wooden sign with text: welcome to Amherstburg – a community for everyone.

RECAP Accessibility Advisory Committee Meeting July 23, 2026

Posted on by
Reply

The committee didn’t accomplish much. The only agenda item, the 2026 Municipal Elections Accessibility Plan was just to receive for information – 51 one minutes and 39 seconds until adjournment.

Chair Shirley Curson Prue rarely reads the land acknowledgement but this time she did; she usually just hands everything over to staff.

Tony Pietrangelo, current committee member and councillor candidate provided two memorable moments:

1.Pietrangelo asked if they were having internet voting.

    Council voted to continue with the costliest, most labour intensive and least accessible in person voting on September 8, 2025. 

    Had it not been for my December 2022 delegation, council would have voted back then for in person voting.

    Pietrangelo was present at the October 23, 2025 accessibility committee meeting when admin advised it of council’s in person voting decision.

    Of course, the committee moved to endorse the 2026 Municipal Elections Accessibility Plan.

    Members still seem unsure of whether to make motions. Typically, the committee limits motions to receive minutes and adjourn but not to receive updates, direct admin to report back, or to take action.

    I did delegate to the committee in 2022 and offered suggestions for the committee to be strong advocates and follow procedural rules, but they disregarded my input as usual.

    2. The second memorable moment was when Pietrangelo enthusiastically praised the National AccessAbility Week flag raising. 

      It was a performative gesture. 

      If I were to describe this event to anyone not in attendance, I’d say a small crowd gathered, Prue read a speech, and a staff member raised a flag – that’s it. 

      small crowd gathered for National AccessAbility Week flag raising at Amherstburg park in 2026.


      This minimal effort is typical of communities that lack a strong commitment to inclusion and accessibility.

      “It’s now part of our standard practices,” advised admin.

      It’s a low standard.

      The town wants to know about voting barriers – at least that’s what the committee was advised. But my input on voting barriers has been disregarded for a few elections by both council and the accessibility committee.

      Councillor Pouget’s motion on December 12, 2024 was that my submission regarding voting barriers be sent to the committee. Of course, the committee didn’t discuss my submission any more than it discussed my previous submissions or my delegations about barriers.

      The town wants more people to vote – at least that’s also what the committee was advised. But staff recommended, and council approved, the most inaccessible traditional in person voting which may limit voter turnout. 

      No one should be surprised that barriers can repress voter turnout and influence feelings of efficacy for voters with disabilities (Schur et al., Reference Schur, Ameri and Adya2017).

      Admin should have recommended a greater variety of voting methods to meet the needs of a variety of voters to increase voter turnout. It’s counterproductive to limit choices and then complain of limited results.

      Of course, council should have directed admin to report on the costs of each voting method in December 2022. 

      Very briefly, the committee mentioned a library audit.

      The library was to have been audited in January 2024. 

      An inoperable push button at the hub, future sidewalk repairs, and pickleball parking were noted.

      Almost an hour for business that could have been addressed probably within 15 minutes.

      Meeting adjourned.

      Opinion – Amherstburg’s vicious politics

      Posted on by
      Reply

      Town blogger Sarah Gibb is calling for more blood on the floor.

      “It’s a toxic environment,” said Miceli. “This town is divided. It really is.”

      This issue has cost Amherstburg not only two investigations and more than $16,400. It has torn the town apart for 10 months. The election was ugly. The meetings on the issue were hostile. And social media has been vicious.

      The above three paragraphs were just some of what Anne Jarvis, Windsor Star, wrote in a June 2019 article, Amherstburg’s charm, history and vicious politics, amid a scandal involving allegations of leaked confidential information.

      Have things changed?

      Sarah Gibb is spouse to current Deputy Mayor/mayoral candidate Chris Gibb. Will she still want more blood on the floor?

      Is it still a toxic environment? Is there still a high turnover of staff? Absent staff? Are staff involved in council debates/discussions? Are staff introducing new business items during meetings? Are administration civil to residents? Responsive to inquiries?

      Is the town still divided?

      Judging by social media comments, it is.

      When I pointed out Linden Crain’s lack of responsiveness to me, his supporters countered with how responsive he is.

      That’s my point. There’s a noticeable divisiveness. Otherwise the consensus would be that he’s responsive.

      Similarly, if the concessions felt more focus was on the downtown core, the core couldn’t relate and wouldn’t have any complaints.

      For as long as favouritism, preferential treatment and indifference or combativeness to opposing views prevail anywhere, there will be division.

      That’s a reality that people don’t always want to acknowledge but it’s a reality nevertheless.

      Jarvis also wrote, people in Amherstburg are engaged, to say the least. Council meetings are often packed. People comment aloud and applaud. There are several local bloggers. But the vicious politics — “it does seem to be endless,” admitted DiCarlo.

      That was seven years ago. Has social media made things worse? Probably. Online algorithms love conflict.

      And it’s too easy to emotionally respond to and personally attack commenters who express opposing views.

      It gets visceral and vicious. I know. I’ve experienced it by some candidates because of my blog, by strangers for my strong disability advocacy, and by some for what appears to be my unwillingness to accept the status quo or engage in toxic positivity.

      Could things get any worse? Maybe.

      Another election could get ugly.

      If there’s a continued division on the new council that fuel the divide but claim it doesn’t exist, things will get worse.

      Free Speech As Delegates Update

      Posted on by
      Reply

      following the post, Free Speech As Delegates, I emailed members of council:

      on a few occasions i’ve requested that you update the 2014 procedural by-law posted on the town’s website. the by-law that most directly affects democracy should reflect current accessibility and human rights legislation and it is within your authority as representatives of the public you serve to address the issue and implement a best practice.

      to assist you, i reached out to the centre for free expression and have included the response below. i urge you to do the same. it should suffice that residents who want to voice their concerns to those elected to listen state the topic/concern/subject matter and be given their 5 minutes of your attention and your consideration and decision. 

      there should be no administrative burdens or barriers to democracy. 

      amherstburg’s first local blogger

      ‘Thank you for reaching out to the Centre for Free Expression.

      It is not unusual for municipal councils to ask delegations wishing to speak to council to register in advance, as your CAO indicates. It is also normal that the requester be asked to specify the agenda item to which you want to speak. All this is helpful in ensuring an orderly meeting in which all those wanting to be heard can be heard.

      That said, I have never heard of a municipality requiring the delegation speaker’s notes, much less the text of the speech, to be submitted ahead of the event. And, I have never heard of a requirement for a copy of the notes or speech text to be submitted with the application to appear. Sometimes when I appear before parliamentary bodies they request a copy of my submission ahead of time so they can distribute it to the committee members and, where there is simultaneous translation, to give a copy to the translators so as to help them. But, this is only after I have been accepted as a speaker and it is not a requirement.

      While I feel it is both wrong and bad practice for your municipal council to do as yours is doing, it is not illegal to the best of my knowledge. It is something that should be fought in the court of public opinion.

      I hope this is helpful.’

      Copyright – this information is protected by Canada’s Copyright Act. Request written permission from the burg watch at gmail dot com.

      Opinion – Denials of delegation requests increasing

      Posted on by
      Reply

      Residents’ requests to speak to council have increasingly been denied. 

      This council seems ok with that.

      “The content of the procedure by-law is generally up to the council,” said an Association of Municipal Clerks and Treasurers Ontario (AMCTO) spokesperson in an email.

      This council had no input on it. The public had no input. 

      But this council did rubber stamp administration’s revised procedural by-law in August 2023.

      Residents pushed back but council wouldn’t reconsider.          

      The by-law states, “The Town of Amherstburg actively encourages public engagement by inviting members of the community to participate in Council and Committee meetings, fostering a sense of inclusivity and transparency in local governance.”

      But does it?

      Deputy Mayoral candidate Bill Petruniak wanted to speak to council Monday night about proposed changes to the town’s Official Plan.

      The clerk’s denial included a reference to previous public consultations – accordingly, no further public deputations are possible at this time. 

      Petruniak’s response back to the clerk was:

      “Thank you for your explanation, sir. The premise of my delegation was to highlight the reality we live in. We are in the 21st century and still attempting to do business like we did 30 years ago. Technology is accelerating exponentially and if Amherstburg does not embrace it and process decisions more quickly we will be left behind. No longer can we rely on higher levels of government to bail us out. Both our federal and provincial bodies are in worse financial shape than Amherstburg. Amherstburg must start governing in a proactive manner or perish. Lead, follow or get out of the way; only the fittest will survive. Taking 17 years to revise the official plan was ridiculous. Hopefully the next council can make some positive changes to Amherstburg’s operational procedures.”    

      Paradoxically, one of the six goals of the town’s Official Plan is, ‘Establish a framework for community engagement.’

      One of the goals of the town’s Strategic Plan, also approved by this council, is, ‘Increase effective communication and engagement with residents.’          

      A few residents were denied an opportunity to speak to the Economic Development Committee in January of this year.

      The committee was advised that both must be true: there would have to be a report or by-law before the body and there would have to be an action or recommendation.

      Deputy CAO Melissa Osborne mentioned delegates could speak at a future meeting, but they wouldn’t be allowed to address town council on the same issue.

      No such rule exists in the procedural by-law. I asked. 

      CAO Critchley only sent me the section that states, “Delegations appearing before Council, who have previously appeared before Council on the same subject matter, shall be limited to providing only new information in any subsequent delegation request.” (emphasis added).

      My January 2024 delegation request was denied.

      I had been advocating for a Routine disclose policy for four years and wanted to speak to the AMCTO’s submission regarding the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

      Deputy clerk Sarah Sabihuddin advised, “it does not directly relate to a report or by-law, and therefore, it does not qualify as a delegation under the procedural framework.”

      Alternatively, Sabihuddin said I could send my concerns to council. “Should a member of Council wish to bring this up during New Business and make a request for an Administrative Report on this item then once this report comes back onto the public agenda then you would be able to delegate at that time as per the procedural by-law,” emailed Sabihuddin.

      Ironically, my April 2026 request to speak about civic engagement and the multi-year accessibility plan was also denied. 

      Also not found in the procedural by-law was a section pertaining to administration’s most recent precedent – “demonstrate how the requested action is connected to the matter under consideration.” 

      Council will be discussing some contentious issues Monday night including their in-camera decisions about Windsor Police, BYOB legislation, a day care centre near 320 Richmond Street. 

      The July 13 council meeting will take place at 6 pm in town hall council chambers and is also live steamed at islive.ca.

      What are the candidates’ position on Open Air? Dhaval Prajapati

      Posted on by

      Sometimes they play favourites and don’t answer my questions. But I’m continuing the 2014 tradition. For now, I’m only asking about Open Air and will set aside a page just for their Open Air answers – IF they answer.

      the burg watch: As you know, Open Air remains a contentious issue, especially because of Councillor Crain’s motion to not revisit it until the end of this term. Will you remove barriers that deny people with disabilities equal access to the community when streets are closed during Open Air weekends?

      Dhaval Prajapati: Open Air is clearly an issue that many residents care about. In speaking with people throughout the community, I’ve heard both sides. Some enjoy the atmosphere and activity it brings downtown, while others have concerns that they feel need to be addressed.

      As someone running for council, I think it’s important to listen to the people affected, understand the different perspectives, and take the time to review the facts before forming a position.

      One of the reasons I am running is because I believe residents want to feel heard and involved in decisions that affect their community. My approach would be to keep those conversations open, listen carefully, and make informed decisions based on what I hear and learn.

      What are the candidates’ position on Open Air? Tony Pietrangelo

      Posted on by

      Sometimes they play favourites and don’t answer my questions. But I’m continuing the tradition I started in 2014. For now, I’m only asking about Open Air and will set aside a page just for their Open Air answers – IF they answer.

      the burg watch: As you know, Open Air remains a contentious issue, especially because of Councillor Crain’s motion to not revisit it until the end of this term. Will you remove barriers that deny people with disabilities equal access to the community when streets are closed during Open Air weekends?

      Tony Pietrangelo: As you know I am on AAAC and want nothing more than to help people living with disabilities in Amherstburg.
      I have registered to run for town council in our next election. That will be my way of getting things accomplished in a way that is beneficial to all. My insights into accessibility will help me help others. 

      the burg watch: You didn’t answer the question. And what, specifically, will accomplish?

      Tony Pietrangelo: If I get elected I will help you in any way I can.

      the burg watch: You’re not answering the question: Will you remove barriers that deny people with disabilities equal access to the community when streets are closed during Open Air weekends? 

      2 weeks later, June 10.

      the burg watch: You haven’t answered my original question so maybe you can answer this one: did the Accessibility Committee identify any barriers at Open Air? It’s a simple yes or no question.

      What are the candidates’ position on Open Air? Chris Gibb

      Posted on by

      Sometimes they play favourites and don’t answer my questions. But I’m continuing the tradition I started in 2014. For now, I’m only asking about Open Air and will set aside a page just for their Open Air answers – IF they answer.

      the burg watch: As you know, Open Air remains a contentious issue, especially because of Councillor Crain’s motion to not revisit it until the end of this term. Will you remove barriers that deny people with disabilities equal access to the community when streets are closed during Open Air weekends?

      Chris Gibb: As the town’s Accessibility Committee has not identified any barriers, I would need you to be more specific and advise me as to which barriers you have identified. I would then be able to address your concerns.

      note: I delegated to council on Open Air barriers; I’ve submitted over a dozen emails to council members and I’ve written several letters to the editor about the exclusion.

      the burg watch: Would you direct me to the minutes of Accessibility committee meetings where the committee did not identify any barriers to open air?

      Chris Gibb: Sorry but I do not recall the exact date of the particular meeting. Perhaps one of the committee members would be able to help.

      the burg watch: I asked Tony Pietrangelo, candidate and accessibility committee member, did the Accessibility Committee identify any barriers at Open Air? It’s a simple yes or no question. 

      Pietrangelo did not respond.

      NOTE: Gibb answered his wife’s 2022 question about Open Air:

      “Personally, I am a huge fan of the Open Air program and I hope to see it continue. I see Open Air as a unique way for the whole “Amherstburg Family” to get together and strengthen our connections with each other, and also develop new connections with new people. If we are going to maintain our small town sense of community as we grow, we have to find ways to gather together and celebrate our fantastic town. We will be seeing a tidal wave of new growth in the next 5 to 10 years with many residents who are new to Amherstburg, if we want to keep our small town charm, we need to have opportunities for those new people to be welcomed into the “Amherstburg Family”, Open Streets is one of those opportunities.”