The Candidate Platforms 2026 page has been updated, including 2022 information, whether they showed favouritism towards bloggers’ questions to the candidates (they did), and Open Air position if known (it’s obvious).
Candidate Q & A 2026
Featured
I am the first local Amherstburg blogger. My questions to the candidates in 2014 created an historical first opportunity for residents to submit questions anonymously through to the candidates. Since then, others copied my format and several Facebook pages keep residents more informed about who wants to represent our town.
I will continue to question candidates, although not all respond any more than they respond to my emails.
All questions will be sent after nomination period closes August 21.
If you have a question, please use the form.
And VOTE October 26.26.
Inconsistencies: Deputy Mayor Gibb On Committees
Deputy Mayor Gibb’s inconsistent approach to committees’ involvement: committees are ‘experts’ but they shouldn’t determine service level.
May 13, 2024 Council meeting
Big Creek watershed email from resident and discussion.
“I’m not going to oppose this motion. I mean, it is what it is. I just personally, I think it’s a little bit, um, I think that this should have gone through the environmental committee. I kind of feel bad that we’re cutting them out of the loop because that’s really their purview. But like I said, this is, I’m not going to oppose it on that. I just think in the future we should think about our committees because they meet and they’re the experts. I would have preferred it to go through that committee first,” said Gibb.
June 25, 2024 Council meeting
Gibb asked Councillor Pouget to clarify her motion to “make a motion to direct administration to request the audit and finance committee to perform a cost analysis study of the Libro Centre.”
“As a member of town council, I’m not comfortable with having a committee determine the level of service that we’re going to provide to our residents. That’s, I think a decision of Council. I would be glad to have that discussion during budget as far as the Libro Centre budget goes, but I can’t support having a committee make that decision for our residents.” said Gibb following clarification.
Flag raising another minimal effort
Another ceremony. Another speech. Another photo op.
Some of Amherstburg’s politicians attended the town’s National AccessAbility Week flag raising ceremony at the Libro Wednesday morning.
Aside from Councillor Diane Pouget, the only council member who has consistently advocated on behalf of residents with disabilities, the others embraced the optics of inclusion.
Mayor Prue delivered a political speech. It sounded like he was reading from a script meant to assure the small crowd that accessibility and inclusion matter in Amherstburg.

I wasn’t convinced. Formed by my lived experience as a person with a disability, attitudinal barriers guide decisions that negatively impact Amherstburg’s disability population.
Prue recognized council members in attendance and wanted to thank the members of the Disability Committee.
(The correct name is the Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee).
“It’s National Accessibility Week, and across all of Ontario, across many parts of Canada, people are wearing red shirts. If you’re wondering, some people, why there’s so many red shirts here today, this is the, this is the logo for today, Red Shirt Day, and people are coming together to celebrate and to acknowledge the accessibility, the importance of accessibility in all of our communities.”
(No, red shirts are not the logo. Red Shirt Day is an Easter Seals Society initiative that is held on the Wednesday during National AccessAbility Week).
Prue acknowledged, at least on this occasion, “that many individuals continue to face barriers every day. These barriers can limit participation and independence, and it is our shared responsibility to remove them.”
(Yet my input on barriers that prevent equal participation has been ignored, dismissed and has resulted in litigation against the town and town clerk).
“Accessibility and inclusion go hand in hand when we design a community to be inclusive, we create a better, more welcoming place for everyone.”
(Yes, but stating a fact doesn’t make it a reality).
Prue then stated council remains, “committed to preventing and reducing barriers in Amherstburg, and to working alongside our accessibility advisory committee, community partners, and residents to make meaningful progress.
(oh, but my April delegation request to call for council to act and create a community engagement policy was denied).
“I just want to say on behalf of the town council, on behalf of everybody who is here, occasionally, some of you may think that we don’t do things fast enough, but I will tell you, within the budgets we have, we try our very best to make that commitment that every event, every festival, every street, every playground, everything that we do has accessibility written right into it.
(Every street can’t have accessibility written right into it when it’s closed. Fourteen weekends of closures that prevent equal access to our own community. Street closures have nothing to do with money or timelines but I think they have everyting to do with attitudinal barriers).
“We’re very proud in the last this year to open two or three new playgrounds, all of which are hugely, hugely accessible.”
(No, they’re not hugely accessible. They’re minimally accessible according to minimal standards).
“They’re designed for children, especially to make sure that they have the same opportunities as other children to go to the playgrounds and to participate in all of the very best ways…”
(Some children with disabilities will not have the same opportunities because minimally accessible playgrounds will exclude some children).
Prue thanked the accessibility committee again, noting they meet about once a month, and they have a lot of thorny issues.
(The committee does not meet monthly, and I don’t recall thorny issues being dealt with. The committee didn’t even discuss my list of barriers encountered when voting).
“They are the eyes and ears of our community, and they advise us as councillors what to do and how to make the community more accessible,” said Prue.
(But Amherstburg isn’t an inclusive community. There are legislative obligations to consult with the public and people with disabilities as well as the committee. I asked for the dates of those consultations; no answer).
Before Prue read the proclamation, he explained his chain of office.
“The chain of office is worn every time there’s a big public event where something of note takes place, or when the mayor is with important people, this is this meets all three criteria. So that’s why it’s being worn today, because you are important. All of you are important to our town in making sure that we do right by the people who need just that little nudge to fully participate.”
(And the ‘nudge’ comment convinced me this was just another speech. It confirmed my belief that attitudinal barriers are prevalent along with a disability model that should’ve faded away a long time ago).
Prue then read the proclamation.
What are the candidates’ position on Open Air? Bill Petruniak
Sometimes they play favourites and don’t answer my questions. But I’m continuing the tradition I started in 2014. For now, I’m only asking about Open Air and will set aside a page just for their Open Air answers – IF they answer.
| the burg watch: As you know, Open Air remains a contentious issue, especially because of Councillor Crain’s motion to not revisit it until the end of this term. Will you remove barriers that deny people with disabilities equal access to the community when streets are closed during Open Air weekends? Bill Petruniak: I sent a proposal to council last year as a compromise solution. They did not respond. The reason given is that they could not discuss Open Air until 2027. I proposed to open up Dalhousie street for one way traffic from North to South and only block off the east vehicle lane. This would allow more parking, access to at least a couple of handicap parking spaces, and make it possible for people who are physically challenged to be dropped off right at Richmond and Dalhousie. I offered to pay for all signage and to even make the sign posts. No reply. This would not satisfy all AODA requirements but at least it would be a start. I asked that a dialogue be started regarding making Richmond more accessible during Open Air but no response either. None of them seem to care. May 25. Answers and questions back from other candidates will be posted in future posts. Candidates that haven’t answered to date: Frank Cerasa |
What are the candidates’ position on Open Air? Frank DiPasquale
Sometimes they play favourites and don’t answer my questions. But I’m continuing the tradition I started in 2014. For now, I’m only asking about Open Air and will set aside a page just for their Open Air answers – IF they answer.
the burg watch: As you know, Open Air remains a contentious issue, especially because of Councillor Crain’s motion to not revisit it until the end of this term. Will you remove barriers that deny people with disabilities equal access to the community when streets are closed during Open Air weekends? May 25.
Frank DiPasquale: yes, will do. May 25.
the burg watch: How will you remove barriers? Haven’t you supported Open Air? May 26.
Frank DiPasquale: Yes I have supported open air . Open Air helped our community through covid, and help redefine Amherstburg. Our community is growing leaps and bounds. Traffic is heavy. It is not wise to shut down streets for entire weekends. If the General Amherst development succeeds can you imagine the bottle necks that will occur. May 26.
Answers and questions back from other candidates will be posted in future posts.
Candidates that haven’t answered to date:
Frank Cerasa
Barriers in the burg
Let’s kick off National AccessAbility Week 2026 (May 31 to June 6) by acknowledging that barriers in the burg exist.
This year’s theme, “Building a Strong, Accessible Canada” is supposed to be a call to action for governments, organizations, businesses, and individuals to take meaningful steps to advance a barrier-free country and ensure persons with disabilities can participate fully in all aspects of society.

What are the candidates’ position on Open Air? Michael Prue
Sometimes they play favourites and don’t answer my questions. But I’m continuing the tradition I started in 2014. For now, I’m only asking about Open Air and will set aside a page just for their Open Air answers – IF they answer.
| the burg watch: According to the Windsor Star article about Malden Centre Park playground, you said accessible outdoor spaces are important for supporting local families and building community connections. Why did you support Open Air which creates barriers to outdoor spaces? As a mayoral candidate, what is your position on Open Air? May 20. Follow up May 23. Prue: Open Air is a fully accessible venue, and every effort is made to make it barrier free. As a mayoral candidate I will review the current guidelines for Open Air and vote for appropriate modifications. The new Council – when constituted has this responsibility. May 25. Answers and questions back from other candidates will be posted in future posts. Candidates that haven’t answered to date: Frank Cerasa Lena Lazanja |
What are the candidates’ position on Open Air? TJ Botsford
As I’ve done since 2014, I’ve emailed questions to the candidates. For now, I’m only asking about Open Air and will set aside a page just for their Open Air answers – IF they answer. Sometimes they play favourites and don’t answer my questions.
| May 19 question to TJ Botsford: Will you remove barriers during Open Air weekends that block people with disabilities from driving to the bank, local stores, bars, and generally driving through town? May 22 followed up. May 23 answer: The town of Amherstburg relies on an excellent Accessibility Advisory Committee to look into these matters. It is my understanding that the Accessibility Advisory Committee ensures all events including Open Air are accessible for residents in Amherstburg. If you have concerns, I would suggest that you contact the Accessibility Advisory Committee. |
Answers and questions back from other candidates will be posted in future posts.
Candidates that haven’t answered to date:
- Frank Cerasa
- Lena Lazanja
Politicians can now be fired for serious misconduct
A unanimous vote by council could result in the firing of a politician if an integrity commissioner finds serious misconduct occurred.
Bill 9, the Municipal Accountability Act, passed 110 to 1 on May 26, 2026.
Bill 68 amended the Municipal Act 2001 in 2017 to mandate municipalities create codes of conduct by March 1, 2019 and hire integrity commissioners.
The legislation prescribed codes were to include rules about gifts, respectful conduct, confidential information and use of municipal property.
Councils were to decide the remaining content of the code of conduct.
The Ministry of Municipal Affairs introduced Bill 9, Municipal Accountability Act, 2025 in May 2025.
The Standing Committee on Heritage, Infrastructure and Cultural Policy held public hearings to obtain feedback on Bill 9 in July 2025.
The bill, ordered for Third Reading on October 25, 2025, was expected to become law prior to the October 26, 2026 municipal election.

Now that it passed final reading, it needs Royal Assent to become law.
The new bill proposes standardized codes of conduct, training, and integrity commissioner processes.
An integrity commissioner may make a recommendation to the Integrity Commissioner of Ontario that a politician’s seat be declared vacant if the commissioner concludes all of the following criteria are met:
- The member has contravened the code of conduct.
- The contravention is of a serious nature.
- The member’s conduct that is the subject of the inquiry has resulted in harm to the health, safety or well-being of any person.
- The penalties set out I subsection 160 (5) are insufficient to address the contravention or to ensure that the contravention is not repeated.
The commissioner may consider, among other matters, whether the contravention is a repeated contravention.
A new function of the Integrity Commissioner of Ontario will be to advise municipalities, on request, about the independence of a person being considered for appointment as a Commissioner, including whether the person has a conflict of interest.
Twenty one years ago, the Honourable Madam Justice Denise E. Bellamy’s Report 2005 recommended the City of Toronto hire a full time integrity commissioner.
The Bellamy inquiry followed allegations of conflict of interest, bribery and misappropriation of funds around computer leasing contracts at the City of Toronto in 1998.
5 Months to Municipal Elections 2026
“The vote is precious. It is the most powerful non-violent tool we have in a democratic society, and we must use it.” John Lewis
VOTE on Monday, October 24, 2026.