As mentioned in Comparing Procedural By-law Public Input, Port Hope residents were invited to provide input; Amherstburg residents were not. Also, Port Hope staff worked ‘with all members of Council to gather their individual input on meeting processes and specific elements of the procedural by-law to ensure the recommended draft by-law is reflective of all points of view on Council.’

On October 19, and again on November 9 because no one answered, I questioned members of council, based on Port Hope’s procedural by-law review.

On November 10, Councillor Allaire answered the questions:

the burg watch: Did members of administration individually consult members of council on the Procedural By-law for input?

Councillor Allaire: No, we were not individually consulted from my knowledge.

the burg watch: Did you consider public consultation? 

Councillor Allaire: No, I did not at the time.

the burg watch: Do you feel that the revised by-law reflects your point of view on civic participation?

Councillor Allaire: No, I believe everyone should have a voice to speak. However, they still do it just seems to happen a lot more behind the scenes as in someone would have to approach council or administration to raise their concern for them, which I am willing to do for residents.

the burg watch: When do you intend to evaluate the policy and to update or amend it?

Councillor Allaire: I did not consider evaluating the policy, updating, or amending it. I will look into it.

The Town of Amherstburg’s August 2023 procedural bylaw seems more restrictive than it used to be and more so than our local comparator municipalities.