Heritage Committee Meeting Highlights: Naming of 179 Victoria Street and Gore Street Development Discussion

The August 8 Heritage Committee meeting started twenty minutes late and the Chair forgot his glasses so he had difficulty reading the agenda.

When it came time to discuss the naming of 179 Victoria Street, Frank DiPasquale was the first to speak. He said it’s a tough decision and wished all committee members had been present, although there was a quorum. Robert Honor suggested that rather than use one of the suggested names twice, a new name be selected like Dr. Bell, whose farm was on that land that he donated. Shirley Prue was also in favour, as was Councillor Crain but he also said he thought one of the three options should be implemented.

DiPasquale still wished to defer it and Ms. Prue said something that she was asked to repeat since it was difficult to hear her; she wanted to know what the heritage planner thought. Mr. Coates said it was not time sensitive and Ms. Prue asked if a motion was needed. (With all the experienced committee members, why is it necessary for anyone to ask if a motion is needed?) Thankfully, the chair said a motion was needed and the motion to postpone with Mr. Coates to look at the Bell recommendation carried.

The next item up for discussion was a residential development on Gore Street. Of course the focus was the Heritage aspect, and whether or not it would comply with guidelines for the proposed heritage conservation district. Ms. Prue asked if there was anything that they needed to be concerned about. The chair noted that the only thing that’s kind of sticking out a little bit to him is the fact that there is a flat roof right over the front porch and he was just wondering if that truly fit in. A second look at the diagram confirmed that it is not a flat roof and they discussed the pitch before a motion was made that the plans be accepted as presented.

Inconsistencies: Meeting Notices

On July 25, I emailed council and CAO Critchley, today’s calendar listing includes the accessibility advisory committee meeting with no agenda link and no notice of cancellation. as you can see from the attached screen shot, it states the event has already occurred. would someone please advise if the meeting will be held?

Critchley replied, The calendar module has a known issue with the statement “the event has already occurred.” We have opened a service ticket with our provider. 

The meeting was tentatively scheduled and has been cancelled, the next meeting will be the fourth Thursday in August, August 22nd. The change has been noted on the page to reflect this cancellation. 

Anyone with interest in staying up-to-date for Town meetings can subscribe at: https://calendar.amherstburg.ca/council/Subscription to receive notifications as they are provided.

And I answered, Thanks. I already subscribe but received no cancellation notice. 

Comparing Amherstburg Council Meeting Behaviour With Others

Compared to Amherstburg council meetings, other local council meetings are a pleasure to watch and they are so much more efficient.

Not one mayor passed an imaginary gavel to speak or ask a question as per Robert’s Rules of Order.

No longwinded speeches.

No repeat questions or belabouring a point.

No staff member on either side of the mayor whispered in his/her ear.

When the mayors asked if there were any comments or questions, the discussion was limited to members of council.

The videos are clear.

Videos are available on YouTube.

Videos zoom in on the speaker or split the screen.

Some provide county council updates.

Some receive county council minutes.

Some, like county council, vote electronically.

Delegates are asked to push the microphone button which is less condescending than a councillor jumping up and down to do it.

Council members were mindful of their microphone positions.

Committee meetings can also exhibit similar behaviour.

A screenshot of Shirley Curson-Prue, chair of the Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee who frequently speaks with the microphone off to the side making her inaudible at times.

Concerns Over Removal of Parking Spots: Questions Raised

Councillor Diane Pouget emailed the following questions to CAO Critchley:

I am very concerned about the removal of two (2) vital parking spots in front of the Salty Dog on Dalhousie Street.  This is the 3rd removal of very limited parking spaces in that area.

I immediately contacted Bill Tetler yesterday morning, while they were building the deck in these prime parking spaces.  Bill explained that Council had approved the Temporary Patio Extension on May 27th.  I am requesting the following information:

  1. A copy of the full report submitted to Council, regarding the Temporary Patio Extension on May 27th.  (Outside of Open Air)
  2. The motion approved by Council, giving permission to remove 2 parking spaces in front of the Salty Dog.
  3. The response and feedback by all businesses in that area, that could be adversely affected by this action.
  4. All correspondence from our relevant committees approving the removal of these parking spots.
  5. A report, regarding any other businesses, that have requested permission to enter into an agreement to remove parking spaces in front of their businesses.

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.  I wait for your response.

Inconsistencies: Deputy Mayor Gibb On Social Justice Issue

On June 25, 2024, during discussion of the Transit Service Agreement Renewal, Gibb said he thinks the other big thing that they’re not talking about is this is really a social justice issue. He continued that there’s a lot of people who can’t afford transportation or reliable personal transportation so he thinks this is a good deal for the people of Amherstburg; it’s the right thing to do so he’ll definitely be supporting it.

When I delegated on March 25, 2024 regarding OPEN AIR I stated, in part, ‘A Divisional Court affirmed that the AODA is “social justice legislation” that is meant to redress a history of discriminatory exclusions by identifying, removing and preventing barriers to participation in society.’ I requested council prioritize a commitment to the principles of governing legislation and ensure everyone is welcome to equally participate in our public spaces.

The number 1 complaint about Open Air is accessibility and Gibb stated on am800 that Open Air is accessible so we just want to invite all of Windsor and Essex County to come out to Amherstburg and get together and have a great time.

But not everyone can participate. Merry go round.

Principles Integrity vs. Elman: Integrity Commissioner Services in Amherstburg

In 2022, council chose Bruce Elman to continue as Integrity Commissioner until December 31, 2024 over Principles Integrity but now Principles Integrity is being recommended to commence July 1.

Aside from the legislative background, the Report to council references council resolutions:

  1. 20170612-767 appointed Bruce Elman as the interim Integrity Commissioner for the Town of Amherstburg. (I could not locate this resolution in the minutes.)
  2. 20180108-11 appointed Mr. Elman permanently to the role for a term which expired on December 31, 2019.
  3. In 2020, the two year renewal clause in the initial contract was invoked, appointing Mr. Elman for a further two year term, which was further extended until June 30, 2024.

From the archives, I found a November 25, 2019 in-camera meeting and resolution 20191125-558 appointing Mr. Elman beginning January 1, 2020 for two years, ending December 31, 2021.

I also found a March 28, 2022 meeting and resolution 20220328-07 that Elman was chosen to continue until December 31, 2024 following a comparison between Principles Integrity and Elman.

In June 2022, the Code of Conduct was amended.

I’ve reached out to CAO Critchley with some questions:

  • Why is council being asked to approve hiring Principles Integrity as of July 1 when Mr. Elman’s contract expires December 31, 2024? 
  • Will taxpayers be paying for two Integrity Commissioners?
  • Was an RFP issued in anticipation of Mr. Elman’s December 31, 2024 contract expiration? If not, why not?
  • If Mr. Elman’s contract was not anticipated to continue to December 31, 2024, was an RFP issued? If not, why not?

I’ll provide an updated post if/when she answers.

Amherstburg Emergency Access: Fire Chief Addresses Concerns and Questions

Fire Chief Montone has answered Councillor Pouget’s questions and concerns about emergency access in red below.

Please find attached a photo and comments made on the Amherstburg Residents Forum Website.  Since this article appeared, I have been bombarded with questions, regarding emergency access to our downtown streets, during the 43 days of closures.

Due to the fact, that you were tied up with an Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing for the last four (4) days, I delayed in sending my concerns to you.  It is ironic, that the OLT Hearing, involved a very contentious proposal for a boutique/hotel on this same street, dealing with fire safety concerns.

I am very worried about the placement of 4 large cookers on asphalt on Ramsay Street and the fact that tables will be set up in a confined space behind the Dalhousie, Ramsay, Richmond, Murray Street businesses and apartments.  What effect will this have on emergency vehicles access, when all these streets will be closed? 

Confusing Downtown Parking Signs in Amherstburg: A Disgraceful Situation

On Friday, June 7, I emailed CAO Critchley and copied council members.

Is this funny? this is disgraceful; the attached photo was taken yesterday. the downtown is littered with these open air signs that do not even look like they can be enforced, even if people can read the fine print. this can be extremely confusing for people with disabilities trying to park only to encounter a sign disallowing them to park in a legitimate accessible parking space.

please confirm that this particular sign will be removed.

An August 2022 post showed the contradictory signs downtown.

Parking But No Parking Signs in Amherstburg

Downtown Amherstburg signs during ‘Open Air’ weekends are confusing. This is a no parking sign in a no parking zone in front of the post office that you can’t get to anyway.

This sign contradicts itself: no parking Friday at 3 pm but you can park until 6 pm Friday. Neither has any by-law number stated.

Emergency Access Concerns Raised by Councillor Pouget in Amherstburg

On June 7 at 9:26 am, Councillor Pouget emailed Fire Chief Bruce Montone pertaining to concerns regarding closed streets, attached a photo and commentary by David Wharram and copied the CAO.

Please find attached a photo and comments made on the Amherstburg Residents Forum Website.  Since this article appeared, I have been bombarded with questions, regarding emergency access to our downtown streets, during the 43 days of closures.

Due to the fact, that you were tied up with an Ontario Land Tribunal Hearing for the last four (4) days, I delayed in sending my concerns to you.  It is ironic, that the OLT Hearing, involved a very contentious proposal for a boutique/hotel on this same street, dealing with fire safety concerns.

I understand you do not live in our community and the closed streets occur mostly after your working hours and on the weekends, so you might not be aware of these activities, that appear to be blocking the streets.  Due to the fact, that bollards are in place at the Dalhousie/Murray, Dalhousie/Richmond, Ramsay/Murray, Ramsay/Richmond Street intersections and tables, tents and games appear to be obstructing these roadways, I am asking for your advice, if you are aware of these issues and if you are concerned with this matter.

Perhaps, as a daughter of a volunteer Amherstburg Firefighter for 35 years and I as a member of Emergency Response Ontario for 23 years, I am very aware of the importance of emergency vehicles to have quick response times,

with unobstructed pathways.  The photo provided implies obstruction to a very busy street.  In the case of an emergency, how would our residents and tourists escape, when being blocked in with very large buildings on both sides of the street?  Would  they have to rush to the intersections of Dalhousie/Richmond or Dalhousie/Murray to escape?  What about our residents with accessibility issues? 

On another note, I am equally concerned about the Rib Fest to be held in the downtown core next weekend.  I copied you on an email on May 23rd, but I did not receive a response from you.  I am very worried about the placement of 4 large cookers on asphalt on Ramsay Street and the fact that tables will be set up in a confined space behind the Dalhousie, Ramsay, Richmond, Murray Street businesses and apartments.  What effect will this have on emergency vehicles access, when all these streets will be closed?  

Please note, that as a Councillor for the Town of Amherstburg, I am copying the Amherstburg Residents Forum to inform them, that I am asking these questions on their behalf as well as my concerns, regarding these important issues.

Photos and Commentary by David Wharram