Tag Archives: accessibility

RECAP Accessibility Committee Meeting August 28, 2025

Posted on by

The meeting started a few minutes late. Chair Shirley Prue called the meeting to order and asked for a minute of silence ‘to commemorate a member of our committee who is no longer with us, who passed recently.’

Before the silence ended, Mayor Michael Prue walked in, waited, and then spoke to his wife from across the room. So, technically, isn’t the mayor out of order? I can’t imagine that behaviour being tolerated at a council meeting.

For whatever reason Shirley Prue asked the clerk to do the roll call; she usually asks the clerk to do the land acknowledgement also but this time she read it.

On to pecuniary interest where a discussion was held because of Tony Pietrangelo’s wish to abstain from item 6.1 site plan review since he used to own that property at one time (McDonald’s). Shirley Prue thought he didn’t have a conflict. Councillor McArthur just wanted to acknowledge, regarding item 6.4 the fest-for-all progress update, that he works for the organizer, County of Essex, in communications and would promote the event on social media. 

Site Plan Review for 151 Sandwich Street South

  • Ms. Prue thought Heidi Ballairgeon was there to talk about this but she said no, she didn’t have this one.
  • The clerk explains the site plan changes for the McDonald’s restaurant, including a two-lane drive-through and expanded rear building area.
  • He said he reviewed the site and didn’t have any particular recommendations beyond what has been provided but of course, it is provided to the committee for any recommendations they may have. (yes, admin has a chance during iits own site plan review process).
  • Following clarification that there will be two order lanes that will merge, the committee receives the site plan without any specific recommendations.

Kings Navy Yard Park Extension Phase 1B

  • Now it was Heidi Baillargeon’s turn to present; her audio kept cutting out.
  • the Kings Navy Yard Park extension phase 1B focused on stabilizing the break wall and addressing accessible walkways that come from Dalhousie Street into the site
  • doing a site remediation by taking contaminated soil out and disposing of it and putting all the underground site servicing and things that most people won’t generally see, but cost a lot of money, so all the servicing for future electrical requirements for the site, future sanitary storm connections, all your hydro, water, gas.
  • Christine Easterbrook asked what was at the very top of that half circle; it looks like there’s steps up to it.
  • Baillargeon said yes, there’s a transition area with a gradual ramp so you can either choose to go down a series of stairs in the middle or you can follow the ramp down the left or the right.
  • Tents could be placed on either side and food trucks could locate around the semi-circle.
  • Pietrangelo asks, how close is the closest accessible parking spot?
  • Baillargeon says the closest accessible parking spot, I believe there is one right on Dalhousie Street, just down in front of flow cafe I think it is. So when Dalhousie gets reconstructed, we are planning on basically taking where the property line is and bumping that into have angled parking all the way along the roadway, so that, you know, we can provide parking for the site, but it’s not part of this project at this point. We don’t have the money to do that right now.
  • Pietrangelo asks Baillargeon, what are you looking for from us to do with this, with your presentation, what do you need from us? (After all the years on this committee, why members are still asking what is being sought from it is odd).
  • Baillargeon says, I’m bringing it to the committee to let you know that we have accommodated and made accommodations for accessibility in the complete transition from Dalhousie Street to the waterfront. (No, universal access would allow for one ramp, not a ramp on either side of a set of stairs like the tourist booth on the highway. Segregated means of access is far less desirable).
  • Councillor McArthur asks, what is right in the centre?
  • Baillargeon says that is supposed to be a future feature. We’ve had some discussions with the Indigenous community in terms of maybe making that part of the three fires Confederacy. 
  • McArthur asks a follow up, benches are there accessible benches throughout the park? (shocking, since I have criticized McArthur for volunteering on this committee and not being a stronger champion for people with disabilities). 
  • Baillargeon says there will be accessible benches throughout the park. There will be the black ribbon style benches that will be going in this section, and they will be located kind of along the pathways closest to the riverfront.
  • McArthur then asks what about fishing in this part of the park?
  • Baillargeon says I think the fishing would be accommodated. 

H Murray Smith, Centennial Park Revised Concept

  • Baillargeon presents the revised concept plan for H Murray Smith, Centennial Park
  • The plan includes a walkway connecting the seniors Active Living Center and accessible parking near tennis and multi-use courts.
  • The committee discusses the need for crosswalks and traffic calming measures along Richmond Street.
  • The clerk mentioned the benches are conceptual in this drawing, because we have to do consultation on those elements. (yes, how many times have I requested meaningful consultations?!) 
  • He said we would want to consult specifically on how far to place those benches so that people could find the rest areas they needed along the route. So all of that would come when we get to building these elements.
  • Easterbrook asks, it’s supposed to be, every what is it? 200 metres and Baillargeon agrees and says we have more than every 200 metres within the plan.
  • Ms. Prue asks, and of course, my favorite question is, where are the washrooms?
  • Baillargeon says the washrooms are located in the Seniors Active Living Center just off the back of that building. 
  • Chris Drew asks are there any designated pickleball courts? 
  • Baillargeon says pickleball is at the Libro. 
  • Pietrangelo asks if the speed limit is still 50 kilometers an hour through Richmond Street. He thought maybe they should lower it. 
  • The clerk said it is a lowered speed limit.

Fest for All Event Update

  • The clerk noted he sees Ron in the room and said so I’m hoping he’s taking some diligent notes. I’ve seen some coverage there in the paper, and hoping we keep seeing that coverage as well, because this is an event we’re really looking forward to.
  • It’s the County of Essex running the fest for all but we have been sort of given the nod to be the host community for this. (the town offered to host it this year).
  • Scheduled for September 12, highlighting possible 50 vendors that showcase services, supports and products for persons with a disability and promote accessibility in the community.
  • The town will have a tent set up and partners doing demonstrations like the miracle league and the ice bullets, the sledge hockey team.
  • Clerk notes, I think that there’s a chance that what we may be best at is showcasing what it is that our site has to offer in terms of built amenities. Obviously, the miracle league itself is a crowning jewel for things to have in a community, for persons with disabilities. You do have that inclusive play structure and that wheelchair swing that’s included there, that are not things that you often see in in many communities.
  • Clerk says we’re going to have our comms team there promoting the town and the services and offerings that it has and the supports that it offers. (That should be interesting).
  • Possible Protesters
  • Chris Drew says I know there’s a lot of interest in it. I’ve got a lot of people that’s been asking me different questions about what happened last year in Colchester, and people are asking what the date is and stuff like that. The only thing is, I’m hearing rumbles that there may be some protesters there, and I hope it don’t happen,
  • Ms. Prue asked, protesting what?
  • Drew says protesting about what goes on in the town with the AODA. 
  • Ms. Prue laughs and then says I’ll be intrigued to hear that.
  • The clerk says for this event the focus is on supports for people with disabilities and, you know, equality in the community is an important message to take home. 

Unfinished Business and Future Plans

  • Pietrangelo raises concerns about the unfinished sidewalk on Pickering and requests a motion to complete it.
  • The clerk says the work is pending some site activities.
  • Ms. Prue asks like what? 
  • The clerk says I’m not at liberty to discuss the development and will find out a timeline.
  • Pietrangelo says we had the flag raising in Essex, I sent an email out to everybody about the Amherstburg flag raising for accessibility. I never got an answer back. So my question is, did we have a flag raising in Amherstburg for accessibility this year? (No, they didn’t).
  • The clerk says I believe we did.
  • Pietrangelo says I don’t know why we didn’t do that this year here in Amherstburg. We should have done it. We should not have left it just Essex County, because Essex County is fine but I think Amherstburg is Amherstburg. (I’m guessing no motion was made to raise a flag in Amherstburg this year).
  • The committee discusses the need for a flag-raising event for National Accessibility Week and the importance of involving schools and whether it should be held at the Libro or town hall.
  • Ms. Prue says last year there was a little bit of awkwardness, I think, in terms of accessibility, even for the patio area of the town hall, there was a couple of hiccups.
  • Easterbrook mentions another opportunity – December 3, which is International Day of Persons with Disabilities. 
  • Pietrangelo asks if he should make a motion or if the clerk can draw one up to have a flag raising every year because if we’re going out of our way to even go with aphasia, you know, we’re really into this, we have to let the people know. I don’t know if Essex County is aware of that. We are the only town that has an Aphasia program going on; that’s important.

New Business Accessible Parking and Streetscape Improvements

  • The clerk says we will be looking at our multi-year Accessibility Plan and notes the Ministry of Seniors and Accessibility has changed grant funding; they require projects be part of the defined plan of the town of the Amherstburg. We know that we have grandfathered structures in the town that are not required to comply with the current provisions. You know, laws get better every year, and sometimes our buildings are not renewed for a number of years. 
  • Easterbrook asked about the little covered bus stop things that we had talked about. The short answer is that they’re not bus shelters.
  • The clerk mentions a review of accessible parking in downtown core and plans to bring back a report for improvements and to do the consultation that’s required. (insert often repeated phrase of requesting meaningful consultation).
  • The clerk says they received a request from a resident that we do have to consider and will bring that to the next meeting.

Essex County’s Fest-for-All: A Call for Action on Accessibility

Posted on by

We need action, not more rhetoric.

From the Essex County News update about the Essex County Accessibility Advisory Committee’s ‘Fest-for-all’.

“Amherstburg is honoured to host this event and there’s no better place to host it than the Libro Centre – an accessible facility and the home of Canada’s first ever Miracle League,” said Amherstburg Mayor Michael Prue. “There will be something for everyone at this amazing festival and it is my hope people come to Amherstburg from far and wide to learn more about accessibility issues and the importance of building inclusive, barrier-free communities.”

Mayor Michael Prue

Well I have been advocating for over 3 decades for accessibility by delegating, emailing, blogging, and writing letters to the editor. I resorted to a human rights complaint against the town to gain equal access to the library following my 10-year campaign.

Both staff and members of council, other than Councillor Pouget, have dismissed the existence of Open Air barriers. The number one complaint in the residents’ Open Air survey is accessibility but council did not take any meaningful action about it.

Councillor Crain

  • was the sole opposition to a residents’ Open Air survey, stating they’ve done an Open Air survey for residents and businesses so he felt it would waste staff time. CAO Critchley confirmed there was no resident wide survey. 
  • Crain was part of the team that created the THRIVE Open Air white paper; from the THRIVE website, ‘We believe that it should be a permanent summer feature.’ 
  • During the 2022 campaign, Crain said yes to removing barriers during Open Air; it is important that all members of the community can experience Open Air. If there are particular barriers in place, I am more than willing to investigate further and help find a solution.
  • Crain also said he didn’t even think Open Air should have been a topic of discussion, that they shouldn’t even be discussing this every year because eventually it’s going to be nothing. 
    • During the November 21, 2024 Economic Development Advisory Committee Meeting Crain moved, McArthur seconded That:
      1. The report on the Open Air including the Business Survey and Open House BE RECEIVED for information; and
      2. Council SUPPORT the continuation of Open Air, in the same format, same times, and same duration, for the remainder of the current term of Council.
    • During the November 25, 2024 council meeting, Crain moved, and McArthur seconded That:
      1. The report on the Open Air including the Business Survey and Open House BE
    • RECEIVED for information; and
      2. Council SUPPORT the continuation of Open Air, in the same format, same times, and same duration, for the remainder of the current term of Council.

Councillor McArthur

  • volunteered to be on the Amherstburg accessibility committee
  • has championed Open Air.
  • McArthur said everybody he talked to loves Open Air the way it is.
  • McArthur stated how families come together, and he didn’t want to take that away from people. (Yet children with disabilities that can’t equally access play areas can’t come together with families, so they have that opportunity taken from them).
  • During the 2022 campaign, McArthur said if there are persisting issues with accessibility, let’s work collaboratively to address them in consultation with the Town’s Accessibility Advisory Committee.

Deputy Mayor Gibb

  • publicly admitted he’s a huge fan of Open Air.
  • Gibb stated he was ‘proud to say that I did complete the ADOA training that was offered to all members of council and I hope to put what I learned into practice not only in my “municipal life” but also in my personal life.
  • And then he said, “to me, Open Air makes the downtown more accessible for people with in at least in wheelchairs because I’ll tell you right now, try and push a wheelchair down one of those downtown sidewalks and you’ll see exactly what I mean.”
  • am800 2024, Gibb said, “”It’s family friendly, it’s free, it’s pet friendly, it’s accessible so we just want to invite all of Windsor and Essex County to come out to Amherstburg and get together and have a great time.”

Mayor Prue

  • broke the tie vote in favour of 14 weekends for 2023.
  • in 2023 Prue said, I have been to every single one of these events and probably most of the Open Air weekends; not all of them, but most of them. I have never seen any problem with access. My wife is the chair of the accessibility committee. I have discussed it with her she has never once said that there was any accessibility problem brought to that committee or anyone on the committee. I know there was one complainant, but I don’t necessarily agree with what’s being said. (aside from my complaint, council was advised that there was a member of the community who felt that there were barriers).
  • On the rainbow crosswalk, Prue said, ‘WE ARE AN INCLUSIVE COMMUNITY. GET USED TO IT’. “It helps to reinforce what an inclusive community is all about.” “I’m very proud of this town and foresight and the inclusivity that people have shown.”
  • On the dog park, Prue said it ‘reflects our commitment to creating a vibrant and inclusive community for all residents, including our beloved canine companions.’
  • On the Salty Dog patio, Prue said I am sorry that some people are not getting out of the way when someone comes by with a cane or a walker or a wheelchair, but what difference would it make if there was two cars there instead of the patio? If they won’t get out of the way on the sidewalk, they won’t get out of the way. And so I think a business case has been made, and I do believe that is in the best interest of the town to be a welcoming and friendly place for people to sit out and have a meal in the sun.
  • During the 2022 campaign, one of Prue’s priorities was, ‘Ensure all town buildings are accessible to facilitate an open and inclusive municipality.’ 
  • Prue referenced the AODA in 2023 and said in this town, we have not brought it into force. 
  • In 2025 Prue referenced the AODA and said, ‘this town has not been compliant. And I have promised, as mayor, and the council has promised, that we will hence for, hence forward, going forward, always be AOD compliant. And I want people to know that the those who have disabilities have every right to use every one of the services in this town, the same as everyone else.’
  • On the sign by-law in 2025, Prue said I don’t mind the signs. I don’t mind them, provided they are AOD compliant. I will never, never support a sign that is blocking someone who is blind, in a wheelchair, a mother in a carriage, with a carriage. I will never, ever support that sign on the street, because those people have rights, same as all of us. They’re not different. They have rights, and their rights, I think, supersede the rights to be safe, supersede the rights to make money.

    Anne Rota
  • was ordered to take human rights training following a human rights tribunal hearing
  • on Open Air, said, ‘there are no barriers in open air. There are not. Please come down and have a look. I know that for a fact. It’s not just the golf cart. We’ve actually opened up our arms if someone needs to get through. We’ve never had one complaint. That’s the honest truth in three years, and I’m sure we would have.’

Accessibility Needs To Consistently Be At Forefront

Posted on by

As published in the River Town Times.

Re Sign bylaw frustrates business owners, town council makes amendment

Council’s discussion and subsequent motion to amend the bylaw to require that all signs be AODA compliant seems misguided and appears to be a performative concern.  

The signs discussed are not mentioned in the AODA or its Regulation. 

The report to council cited AODA compliance for sidewalks as per the Design of Public Spaces Standard. However, even then, sidewalks are to be made compliant when constructing new ones or redeveloping them. Although there are AODA exemptions for sidewalks for heritage reasons, they were not relied on for George Street.

Admittedly, A-frame signs can be a barrier but if placement is a concern then guidelines need to be created like in other municipalities that have approved Heritage Conservation Districts.

Deputy Mayor Gibb is quoted as saying, “we’ve charged other businesses to use town property. I don’t know what the difference is here.” My guess is there is a difference between patios taking away valuable parking spaces and a sign on a boulevard interfering with nothing.

As for the claim that these infractions, ‘undermine the Town’s efforts to maintain an inclusive and navigable public space,’ council has had opportunities to increase inclusivity but has not done so.

Open Air barriers prevent equal participation of some people with disabilities and do not provide an inclusive and navigable space. The number one resident complaint in the Open Air survey is accessibility. I emailed and/or delegated eight times requesting council to enact a patio policy to ensure AODA compliance and I provided a resource. Other barriers to equal participation need to be removed and there needs to be meaningful consultation with the disability community.

There needs to be a stronger commitment to accessibility, but it needs to be consistently at the forefront. Otherwise, one might conclude that accessibility is being embraced for appearance’s sake or when it suits.

Commentary by Linda Saxon

Multi-Year Accessibility Plan Survey Errors

Posted on by

Aside from errors and the misspelling of Cholchester, my opinion is that the survey does not seek meaningful feedback.

The title on ‘talk the burg’ is, Year 3 Multi-Year Accessibility Plan Survey, but then it states Year Two: “The Town of Amherstburg needs your feedback to assist with the Year Two Public Consultation on the Multi-Year Accessibility Plan.”

It states, “This year’s focus will be on five key areas” but lists only three:

  1. Parkland/Trails and bench placement;
  2. Recreation/Play Equipment and its placement;
  3. Accessible Street Parking.

Another error is the date; it states, “All surveys must be received by Tuesday, July 3, 2025.” It should read Thursday, July 3.

As for the survey questions, under the heading, Parkland, Trails & Recreational Amenities, did you use a bench on multi-use paths or trails, where, was it conveniently placed?

Same if you used a bench in a park.

Under the heading, Recreation/Play Equipment, if anyone in your household requires accessible playground structures, which parks you use, if placement of accessible playground elements was conveniently placed.

Under the heading, Accessible Street Parking choose your primary and secondary means of travelling in town: car, bus, taxi, walk, mobility device, other and if you require accessible parking, what percentage of the time you locate a spot, or select ‘I do not require an accessible parking,’ (space missing) which shouldn’t be a choice if you selected yes to requiring accessible parking.

There’s a fourth heading, not listed, for Communication. The accessibility advisory committee has focused on an Aphasia Friendly initiative this past year; the town applied for and received a $16, 375. provincial grant to “raise public awareness and enable change in all aspects of public life. The Town of Amherstburg has partnered with Aphasia Friendly Canada and the Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory at the University of Windsor with the goal to establish Amherstburg as the country’s first Aphasia Friendly community.” I have reached out to the group a few times but my questions remain unanswered.

Under the heading, Communication the survey asks for self-identification of having a communication disability and what is used to communicate with people outside the home, such as at a business or the municipality (the assumption is that one doesn’t use communication aids in the home I guess). Selections include sign language, electronic device, cards, personal assistance, other, and ‘I am not a person with a communication disability’ which, like the parking question, shouldn’t appear if the answer is yes.

There are two unrelated questions pertaining to your awareness of and attendance at last year’s inaugural Accessibility for All event at Cholchester Harbour in Essex. (The proper event title is, “Accessibility Fest-for-All”) and the same for the 2025 event at the Libro.

Amherstburg Library Relocation: Community Concerns Unveiled

Posted on by

Re RTT article, Amherstburg library in early stages of possible relocation, nothing imminent. 

Deputy Mayor Gibb’s statement that “people are assuming something is imminent” is concerning since he advised the library board in March that the town “is expected to begin searching for a new location for the Amherstburg branch in April.”

Gibb claimed his March 26 library board meeting comments stemmed from a March 25 council notice of motion, although council had not debated the notice of motion until April. Council’s subsequent motion was to obtain an administration report on future opportunities to relocate the branch. It might have been more helpful if the library had been included in the town’s space needs study last year.

Three council members’ allegations regarding library deficienciesu are disconcerting, especially because they have not answered questions about the reasons for their statements. 

While Gibb mentioned it certainly has challenges with the tall shelves, which most libraries have, Councillor McArthur stated it’s not as accessible as it otherwise might be ideal. Councillor Allaire said she would like the library to have a new place ‘that’s accessible’ and our library service is small and ‘not as accessible as we want it to be,’ and ‘its challenges are inaccessibility.’ 

The focus of the library board’s facilities space review was space preference which should not be construed as inaccessibility. 

In April, I asked the library board to provide me with any documentation indicating there are accessibility issues at the Amherstburg library; this month, I submitted a Freedom of Information request.

For decades I have repeatedly requested a stronger commitment to accessibility, while Mayor Prue referenced the AODA and declared that they have not brought it into force and this town has not been compliant. 

Council needs to prioritize accessibility and respond to community requests for washrooms in parks, shade structures, inclusive playgrounds, sidewalk repairs or replacements, rest areas, an accessible town hall, accessible voting, accessible signage, accessible parking and paved parking lots, for example. 

Council also needs to justify that its decision on whether to relocate the library is based on facts and not conjecture.

Linda Saxon

Inconsistencies: Councillor Allaire – Transparency

Posted on by

Elected officials should be held accountable for statements, actions, and decisions made on behalf of the community. Amherstburg’s Code of Conduct Definitions include: Transparency in government implies openness, accountability and honesty.

During the April 14 council meeting, Councillor Allaire said she would like the library to have a new place ‘that’s accessible’ and our library service is small and ‘not as accessible as we want it to be,’ and ‘its challenges are inaccessibility.’ 

Unanswered questions: Would you please explain how this library is not accessible? Is this just your opinion? Or did you obtain an expert opinion? Can you cite an authority for your statement or a basis? And who is we? Are you referring to any standard regarding what you want it to be? Emailed April 15, followed up April 18 and 21.

During the April 29 council meeting, Allaire asked for a bit more transparency; she also mentioned more transparency, “which is what I would love,” at the May 12 meeting.

On June 14, I emailed Allaire that I believed she was not being transparent about her library accessibility issue statements. I reminded her that I emailed a couple of times but that she ignored my questions. I also quoted some of her statements about transparency at meetings: “I’m genuinely asking for a bit more transparency in adding it to our social media” and “I feel that the transparency was limited recently, and I think that that’s what the public really wants” and “I actually appreciate the fact that it keeps some sort of transparency.”

Still Silence From Council Members Allaire, McArthur and Gibb

Posted on by

Council members Allaire, McArthur and Gibb alleged there were deficiencies at the Amherstburg Library during council meetings but none have answered my questions about their statements.

Following the February 14, 2025 presentation to Amherstburg town council by Essex County Library Board Mr. Joe Bachetti, Councillor Donald McArthur said, ‘in terms of the one thing there the redesign of physical spaces to promote flexible, welcoming branches that are accessible and modern, I think there must be some challenges in Amherstburg. We have a beautiful building, but it’s not as modern as accessible I don’t think as it as otherwise might be ideal. 

During the April 14 council meeting, Councillor Molly Allaire said she would like the library to have a new place ‘that’s accessible’ and our library service is small and ‘not as accessible as we want it to be,’ and ‘its challenges are inaccessibility.’ 

During the April 14 council meeting discussion, Gibb said, ‘it’s certainly not, well, I’m not gonna say it’s not accessible; it certainly has challenges with the tall shelves. It’s better if you can spread them out and have shorter shelves.’ 

EMAILS TO COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Allaire: During last night‘s council meeting, you said you would like the library to have a new place ‘that’s accessible’ and our library service is small and ‘not as accessible as we want it to be.’ Would you please explain how this library is not accessible? Is this just your opinion? Or did you obtain an expert opinion? Can you cite an authority for your statement or a basis? And who is we? Are you referring to any standard regarding what you want it to be? Emailed April 15, followed up April 18 and 21.

McArthur: During a council meeting earlier this year you referenced an accessible library. Do you consider the current library inaccessible? If so, in what way? Is this your personal opinion? Or did you obtain an expert opinion? Emailed April 16, followed up April 19 and emailed Following up. Since you spoke about accessibility of the Jack Purdie Park trail at the April 14 meeting, I thought you would’ve welcomed an opportunity to comment on accessibility at the library. If not, people might assume you promote accessibility when it suits April 23.

Gibb: During an Amherstburg Residents’ Forum meeting that you attended, I asked you if the library board noted any deficiencies and you answered, ‘none whatsoever.’ During the April 14 council meeting, you said, ‘it’s certainly not, well, I’m not gonna say it’s not accessible; it certainly has challenges with the tall shelves. It’s better if you can spread them out and have shorter shelves.’ So you do think it’s accessible? Don’t all libraries have ‘tall shelves?’ Have you heard of reachers? Will all the library branches be altered so they have ‘shorter shelves?’ Is this just your opinion or an expert’s opinion? Emailed April 23, followed up May 14.

I’ve also reached out to the library board and submitted an FOI request for documentation from same.

20 Year AODA Anniversary – Barriers In The Burg

Posted on by

Then-MPP Michael Prue stood in the Ontario Legislature twenty years ago today, on May 10, 2005, where the historic Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) unanimously passed. Watch the moment at about 4:26 into the video.

As Mayor, during a May 23, 2023 Amherstburg Council Meeting, Prue declared we have not brought it into force. Listen to the audio.

Unofficial transcript: 2025 we’re going to have to make everything accessible in this town, that’s the law. I was in the legislature 20 something years ago, and I spoke to this issue when the bill was presented in the legislature, and I scoffed at them. I scoffed at the liberals who were standing up waving this piece of paper around, saying we’re going to be accessible, because it could take 25 years to bring it into force. Well, in this town, we have not brought it into force. 

When the first dog park opened in Amherstburg, Prue was quoted as saying, it ‘reflects our commitment to creating a vibrant and inclusive community for all residents, including our beloved canine companions.’

During a January 27, 2025 council meeting, Prue referenced the AODA and said, ‘this town has not been compliant. And I have promised, as mayor, and the council has promised, that we will hence for, hence forward, going forward, always be AOD compliant. And I want people to know that the those who have disabilities have every right to use every one of the services in this town, the same as everyone else.’

For as long as barriers exist, and they do, no one should claim we are an inclusive community. It takes strong leadership and a strong commitment to remove the barriers and keep promises.

Another ‘Want’ With An Over-expenditure Approved – Jack Purdie Park Trail

Posted on by

To ensure that anyone interested would like to read an accurate blog post about my April 14 delegation to Amherstburg council I’m sharing this document, which is what I actually stated. I reminded council that consultation with persons with disabilities was mandatory and I requested council to create a process to ensure compliance with the AODA Regulation, embrace the spirit of the AODA and to create an engagement policy, a topic that wasn’t discussed much and one which was not granted.

Jack Purdie Park Trail

In response to Councillor Pouget’s questions, the clerk outlined a four step consultation process that included consulting the accessibility committee and the public, which is what I pointed out. The AODA Regulation clearly states that, aside from the public and accessibility committee, it is mandatory to consult people with disabilities. Council’s lengthy discussion about the Jack Purdie Park trail then focused on the approximate $100,000. over-expenditure and procurement processes.

McArthur spoke about the condition of the trail and said they need to fix the trails in that park. It’ll benefit the people in the monopoly subdivision, will benefit the entire community, it will benefit the 6300 people with accessibility issues in town (people don’t have accessibility issues, they have disabilities and I bet he didn’t know about the 6300 people until I mentioned it that night) because it is going to make a wider path from a narrow one. It’s going to fix a patchwork of alligator cracks, and it’s going to be AODA compliant. (He actually mentioned AODA complaint).

Deputy Mayor Chris Gibb thought it was time to deliver for the people who live in that area. He believed it was the parks master plan, one of the top amenities that people wanted were walking trails so it checks that box for him. It’s unfortunate that it’s over budget, but costs are rising faster than anybody can account for them, which is certainly no fun. But we got to do what we got to do. I like the idea of having this in the park so that kids learning to ride bikes or roller blade or whatever can do it in the park rather than on the streets or on the sidewalks.

Councillor Crain parroted the master plan and he likes how they’re incorporating a number of trees and they’re now going to be making this pathway accessible; it went to the accessibility committee as well. (I don’t think he watched the accessibility committee meeting because the committee just sat there without any comments or questions, other than one member who asked how much over budget they were, $100,000. and the clerk interjected to say financials really are not in the realm of the advisory committees). About the high cost, well it’s very difficult for staff to catch up to that point when it is put out to tender.

Councillor Pouget said she would be voting against this; she cannot in good conscience vote for this. In a perfect world, maybe back in 2022 things were so different. Now in 2025 our residents fear for their livelihood. They’ve heard over and over again the food bank cannot keep up; they have over 27% increase with the needs of our municipality, and the mission is the same way. People are fearing for their jobs and their livelihood; they don’t know how they’re going to put food on the table and provide the necessities of life for their family. She believed it was unreasonable and unfair to approve a large, $100,000 over-expenditure for an eighth trail and the third large sliding hill in these tough economic times. This council cannot justify spending this large amount of money on a want instead of a need when Council must approve $191,303 for a boiler replacement tonight, and take $91,000 from reserves at the Libro, pay $3 million for a fire truck and another $91,000 taken from reserves. These are necessary needs. The track and hill are not a need; they are a want. This money for this expenditure, for this already beautiful park, would be better used to pay for the unforeseen costs of the expansion of our water treatment plant, the new policing replacement and contract, the town hall, the former Duffy’s property, and the upgrades and necessary repairs to all municipal buildings, crumbling infrastructure and replacement of dwindling reserves. It’s unfair to pour additional money to one park while other parks have been neglected, and it’s unreasonable to approve this over expenditure on a $30,000 grant from Enbridge that is currently unknown. It is ridiculous to approve this expenditure on these wants instead of these needs, when washrooms and shade cover are more important for this park. Just this past week, we were told that they couldn’t afford to repair the window sills at the library unless it went to the heritage committee and to the 2026 budget. Today, they were told they can’t fix six concession north, even though it’s in deplorable condition to the 2031 budget. For these reasons, I think that what we should be doing is taking a pause on this park and until our economy improves. 

Mayor Prue passed the gavel to reminisce and praise Councillor Allaire. Prue mentioned sitting there in 2021 and talking about this park and an administration motion to sell a portion of the park off in order to get enough money to build what we’re building today. Well, ‘God bless Councillor Allaire, because she wasn’t a councillor then, but she went around that whole area putting up signs and organized the community. The community wanted no part of that park being sold off.’ (Generalized statements about survey results are often made, including claims that everyone wants it. As someone in the Jack Purdie Park survey commented, “Only approx. 369 people out of a town of 22,000 completed the survey. Why was some affordable housing options dismissed completely based on a survey completed by 369 persons out of 22,000 persons population?? A lot of power given to 369 opinions.”

Prue continued with his speech. What they wanted, and what they’re getting, is that park to be developed and we have fought for this for the last four and a half years for this to be a jewel, and I’m disappointed that it cost me more money than we thought it was going to cost but I will tell you that the council has to think long term. We have to listen to the residents. The community organized itself and said exactly what they wanted in this park. They’ve gone to all the meetings. They’ve told the staff what they want. They’ve gone to the meetings with the Parks and Recreation Committee. They’ve gone to the meetings with the accessibility committee. They’ve gone and explained every single aspect that’s necessary. I wish it was less money. Yes, I do. But remember, there are 12 people, 12 separate companies bid on this, 12 of them, and this was the lowest. So I don’t think we’re getting bamboozled here. I think that’s just the cost. So you either believe in those things that we said four and a half years ago or five years ago, and you believe in what the community wants and it’s the right thing to do, or you don’t, yes, can we save the money? Yes. Can we do something else? Yes, but I will tell you, there will be a lot of disappointed people in the monopoly area, all those kids (there’s about 2600 children ages 0-14 in town), all those parents, all those people have spent four and a half years fighting for this to see it go down the tubes. And I won’t let that happen.

In the end, the project was approved with only Councillor Pouget opposing the project.

Crickets From Council Members Allaire, McArthur and Gibb

Posted on by

Not one of the three council members that I’ve contacted has answered any of my questions regarding their comments about accessibility issues at the library. I’ve contacted Allaire and McArthur three times and Gibb once.

I’m wondering if accessibility matters when it suits. For example, McArthur, who volunteered to be council’s rep on the Accessibility Committee, spoke about accessibility of the Jack Purdie Park trail at the April 14 council meeting but he won’t comment about the library. Mind you, he is an avid supporter of trails – both walking and biking.