Tag Archives: Open Air Amherstburg

Open Air Approved/Not Approved

Posted on by

Open Air was approved during budget, according to Deputy Mayor Gibb, but Councillor Pouget stated it was not approved. Where’s the motion?

On March 26, the day after the March 25 council meeting discussion of Open Air, I requested the information below from CAO Critchley, who answered on Saturday during the long weekend, noted in blue after each request.

  1. council’s motion to approve Open Air for 2024. 
    All motions were referenced in the report that went to Council on March 25, 2024, a copy of which can be found on the Town website.
  2. the cost of open air for 2023. 
    This information is contained in the presentation  made by the Director of Development/Deputy CAO at the Council Meeting of March 25, 2024, which presentation will be attached to the Minutes of this meeting. The Minutes of the meeting will be available on the website once approved by Council.
  3. what undue hardship the town would endure if open air ended. 
    As the words used in this question have a particular meaning in law, I will refrain from answering it in this venue.
  4. any documentation that administration included the exclusion of people with disabilities as a risk in an open air risk analysis. 
    The footprint for Open Air was reviewed by the Accessibility Advisory Committee in December 2023. The minutes of that meeting are also available on the website.

    I emailed back: Question 3 does have meaning in law but that shouldn’t prevent you from answering it; you didn’t answer question 4 which should be yes or no and if yes, include documentation. I didn’t ask about the accessibility committee that, as everyone should be aware, cannot speak on behalf of council or administration. I specifically asked about administration.

Listen To The Music

Posted on by

Bethany D’Alimonte, Musicland owner, delegated at the March 25 council meeting in favour of Open Air. Listen to the audio at the end of this post.

Councillor Pouget was the first to thank D’Alimonte and asked if she was representing the entire core area downtown or just a specific group; D’Alimonte said she was representing all businesses. Pouget asked if she got permission from all the businesses including the hairdressing shops and the barber shops. D’Alimonte said she talked to pretty much everyone downtown and they’re not against Open Air; they’re against the people who are overbearing it.

When Pouget asked what she meant by ‘overbearing, D’Alimonte answered that they are against the people who are trying to come at them saying that they are against open air; that they’re not against open air and words have been twisted.

Pouget relayed that last year there were a large number of businesses that did not feel 14 weeks was a good compromise, that it was going to hurt their businesses and they left in tears.

Councillor Donald McArthur then thanked D’Alimonte and mentioned in the old days if you needed equipment in a pinch to play music you had to go all the way to Windsor; now they can go to downtown Amherstburg; he thinks it’s fantastic. He asked about summer plans, D’Alimonte’s garage door, and if it was her intention to play music and fill the streets with the beautiful music.

D’Alimonte said plans for the summer were to incorporate what they did last year; they added to open air by having live music off their front stage; she mentioned plans to host an open mic night and this year do it from their stage as well as one weekend near the town clock and stage.

Councillor Courtney also thanked D’Alimonte and asked about the spike in revenues she said she noticed. D’Alimonte repeated the 151.9%. Courtney asked if she attributed that strictly to the open air, the closing of the streets for generating that profit? D’Alimonte said she did.

D’Alimonte agreed with Courtney that she was fortunate to be in the footprint of open air and very grateful for the opportunity.

Listen to the audio.

Open Air Questions Linger A Year Later – Undue Hardship?

Posted on by

Last spring, following my delegation to council regarding Open Air, I emailed members of council.

2023

request: a description of the undue hardship the town would endure if all the Open Air barriers were to be removed so everyone could equally participate in the community, on and in publicly owned public spaces, as i explained on Monday, March 13, 2023.

two weeks later: it’s now been two weeks since i asked the question below which hasn’t been answered. if no elected official can provide a description of the undue hardship, maybe someone could find the answer from administration? or if members of administration are receiving emails to council, one could answer? I expect someone would know the answer and await it.

Councillor Pouget answered: I do not know the answer to your question.  Do I have your permission to forward your email to administration for their review and response?

2024

Followup subsequent to my delegation to council regarding Open Air Monday night, I emailed Councillor Pouget: did you ever get an answer to my question that i asked on march 15, 2023? 

march 15, 2023: i’m writing to request a description of the undue hardship the town would endure if all the Open Air barriers were to be removed so everyone could equally participate in the community, on and in publicly owned public spaces, as i explained on Monday, March 13, 2023.

Councillor Pouget answered: Sorry, I did not receive a response.

Email request to CAO Critchley, cc to council:

  1. council’s motion to approve Open Air for 2024.
  2. the cost of open air for 2023.
  3. what undue hardship the town would endure if open air ended.
  4. any documentation that administration included the exclusion of people with disabilities as a risk in an open air risk analysis.

Councillor Pouget answered:

  1. To my knowledge, there was no motion to approve Open Air in 2024.
  2. There is no official cost for Open Air in 2023 because it did not include the cost of our Public Works employees.
  3. I personally don’t believe there would be any undue hardship for the Town if open air ended.
  4. Council has never received any documentation to include the exclusion of people as a risk in an open air risk analysis.

Open Air Amherstburg Access Questioned

Posted on by

This opinion by Linda Saxon was published in the River Town Times, March 31, 2021.

RE: Open Air Weekends Approved March 24, 2021

It was interesting to read about the variety of ideas that might possibly entice visitors or change the purpose of the weekend events.

The article mentioned, “Councillor Marc Renaud said there is a lot of parking a short walk from the downtown core, noting many will walk to and around shopping malls.”

In a report to council, Anne Rota and Nicole Rubli noted what the transportation planners suggest is an acceptable range of walking distance for retail, employee and special event parking.

The figures mirror those in an article originally published in 1994 when the authors discussed conditions that should be taken into account to determine how far people using parking garages should be asked to walk. It was determined that there was a lack of consensus for what is considered maximum walking distance.

The report mentions beliefs, perception and“the travel distance acceptable to an individual is contingent on an individual’s willingness to walk.” Transportation studies mention a willingness to walk in terms of close proximity to transit.

Notably absent was any reference to accessibility guidelines or consultation with residents with disabilities and the Amherstburg Accessibility Advisory Committee which has a mandated duty to advise council about the requirements and implementation of accessibility standards.

A separate report to council regarding accessibility requirements noted, “no consultation with the committee was possible at this time” due to COVID, yet the committee met previously during COVID on zoom, as has council.

Given mandatory training on the human rights code and accessibility legislation, why was there no checklist identifying potential barriers and their removal? If persons with disabilities had been consulted, barriers could have been prevented. For example, placing a group of accessible parking spaces on Dalhousie street is unacceptable, considering the slope on the southwest side.

Administration would also recommend the elimination of the Kings Navy Yard Parklot being a primary accessible parking location. Why? These spots were allegedly under-utilized. The town is obliged to provide a specific number of accessible parking spaces so it should not remove them, unless they cannot be accessed due to road closures.

Other potential barriers should have been identified. How many accessible parking spaces are type A? type B? What is the percentage of accessible seating in the eating areas? Are there any rest areas? How many accessible washrooms are there? Are the pathways unobstructed? Is signage accessible? Is marketing material available in alternate formats?

If there is a parking problem, maybe the problem is with the plan that barricades access to the downtown area.