Candidate Michael Prue On Budgets 2022

Posted on by

During the 2022 mayoral portion of the Chamber of Commerce candidate night, Michelle Maluske of CTV reporter asked, The Town of Amherstburg has a $54 million budget and as mayor, you may hold a unique role as the chair of a council of six elected to govern and lead our town. What makes you uniquely qualified and the best person for the job? Why do you want to be mayor?

Michael Prue’s answer: (listen to the audio).

Thank you. And first of all, the mayor is an absolutely unique role in every municipality in Ontario and indeed in Canada. The mayor’s job is not only to lead, but the mayor’s job is also to try to seek consensus from amongst the seven individuals who sit around the table and also to listen very carefully to the staff and try to come together so that a common decision can be made so that the entire council can go out and support it. I have spent a lifetime working on budgets 17 years as as a municipal politician and 13 years in the province of Ontario, I’ve been on the budget committees, I’ve been on the audit committees in all of them. And I will tell you, it is a difficult task, but it’s made easier if you have a resolve. And my resolve has always been that we have to start every budget with no increase. And in the past this this town has come in and the CAO has said we want eight and nine and 10% and council’s had to beat it back. But I believe that we should be coming in at no increase or whatever inflation is and work from there. And if you do a zero based budget, you’re going to get far better results than if you do it the way that it’s been done in the past. And I believe my experience coming in with 17 budgets municipally with no tax increases, save and except the last one, no tax increases at all will will allow this town to go forward and assured that there will be that there will be sufficient money and we will make it we will make it work. I know that people are saying we’re broke, but we’re not really broke. There is enough money in in the in I’ll deal with that later. There is enough money in our budget and in our coffers to make sure that there is no necessity for a tax increase this year.

Where Is The Routine Disclosure Policy?

Posted on by

Another farcical item for council’s January 29 meeting is a recommendation for council to support AMCTO’s submission regarding MFIPPA, which includes a recommendation to require municipalities to adopt a Routine Disclosure and Active Dissemination Policy (RD/AD).

The submission even includes a graphic: ‘Did You Know? AMCTO has a guide offering considerations for establishing RD/AD’ with a link to the document: Considerations for Establishing Routine Disclosure and Active Dissemination.

During the June 2023 meeting discussion of an RD/AD policy, Councillor Pouget stated the AMCTO, the association of municipal clerks and treasurers of Ontario, do give guidelines for this policy and asked, has that been taken advantage of? Do you know if you’ve tapped into that resource?

CAO Critchley responded, as I said earlier, if this is something that council wants us to do, then we will look into it if that’s what Council directs.

Pouget then made a motion and council passed a resolution directing administration ‘to bring back a report regarding a Routine Disclosure Policy’ and the Unfinished Business list stated a report was coming to council in Q3. No policy exists.

It’s been almost four years since I requested council create a protocol for requests for information and on a few occasions I was advised that a policy was in the process of being created.

A Brief History

2020: former CAO Miceli advised, the town is in the process of creating a Routine Disclosure and Active Dissemination Policy and respecting the MFIPPA process is best for all parties.

2021: former Clerk Parker stated, the Town does have a draft of the policy in progress.

2021: I asked if council directed administration to create this policy.

2021: Former Mayor DiCarlo advised, this policy is being created as part of ongoing policy review of all of the town’s policies, not from a specific council direction. 

2021: I asked then-Councillor Prue if he would know the status of the policy; he did not answer the question.

2022: I emailed Interim CAO Haddad to inquire about the status of the policy; no answer.

February 7, 2023 CAO Critchley advised the town has not adopted a specific policy.

June 13, 2023 Nancy Atkinson, on behalf of the Amherstburg Residents Forum, raised three items including the Routine Disclosure Policy.

June 13, 2023 Councillor Diane Pouget’s motion to direct administration to bring back a report regarding the disclosure policy was carried.

December 1, 2023 I emailed council again requesting the status of, and report on, the routine disclosure policy. 

December 13, 2023 follow up email requesting the status of, and report on, the routine disclosure policy. 

December 18, 2023 CAO Critchley advised, we continue to work on the Routine Disclosure issue and expect it will move forward in the new year.

Downtown Sidewalk Issues

Posted on by

Another paradox. One of the interesting items on the January 29 agenda is a report to council to remove trees in the downtown core sidewalk and replace the interlocking bricks at a cost of up to $31,000 to be transferred from the AODA Compliance Fund.

Admin also recommends four advisory committees be consulted:

  • Heritage Committee – Regarding Historic Interlocking Brick Sidewalks
  • Environmental Advisory Committee – Regarding Carolingian Species 
  • Accessibility Advisory Committee – Regarding Barrier Free Routes of Travel
  • Economic Development Advisory Committee – Regarding Streetscape Beautification

There is no mention of public consultation in accordance with the Integrated Accessibility Standards Regulation regarding exterior paths of travel, rest areas. Designated public sectors, like the Town of Amherstburg, when constructing new or redeveloping existing exterior paths of travel that they intend to maintain, shall consult on the design and placement of rest areas along the exterior path of travel and shall do so in the following manner: 

  1. the public and persons with disabilities.
  2. a municipal accessibility advisory committee if one exits.

The same committees would be consulted for proposed planters to be introduced into the Richmond corridor only being placed where significant sidewalk space allows for such installations for the following reasons:

  • Heritage Committee – Regarding Historic Interlocking Brick Sidewalks
  • Environmental Advisory Committee – Regarding Carolingian Species
  • Accessibility Advisory Committee – Regarding Barrier Free Routes of Travel
  • Economic Development Advisory Committee – Regarding Streetscape Beautification

editor note: I think that should read Carolinian Species.

The committees’ discussions should be interesting. I predict an in-depth discussion will take place with the Heritage committee to consider the colour, shape and size of the bricks and the overall aesthetics of the downtown core.

The report to council concludes with Financial Matters and admin’s recommendation to use Accessibility Compliance Reserve Funds that are ‘intended for repairs and improvements designed to reduce or remove barriers and promote greater access to public spaces, goods and services.’

One of my concerns is that, once again, planters will create barriers for people with disabilities who rely on visual cues and space to travel along the sidewalks. Another concern is that there is no mention of what standards will be specified in the tender. Where did the $31,000. price tag come from?

Who Are ‘You People’?

Posted on by

Someone started a rant to me with ‘you people just want to complain’ and included ‘wheelers’ in response to a Facebook conversation about inclusivity of an event.

‘You people,’ like ‘those people’ implies, to me, that people with disabilities are a separate segment of society. And, historically, people with disabilities have been disadvantaged, not by disabilities, but by a society where ableism prevailed and the identification, prevention and removal of barriers hasn’t been a priority.

As a person with disabilities, the barrier that I encounter the most is the attitudinal barrier; it’s usually based on stereotypical beliefs that people using wheelchairs make up the majority of the disability community or that people are demanding extra.

Do you know anyone that has or has had cancer? diabetes? arthritis? MS? lung disease? heart disease? dyslexia? low vision? hearing loss? ADHD? depression? anxiety? Then you know someone that has a disability.

While there are legislative definitions of ‘disability,’ there are also various models of disability that describe attitudes toward people with disabilities and I can usually quickly spot and categorize where people fit in.

There is a longer list, but briefly, the medical model where members of the medical community need to ‘fix’ an individual. The charity model; I see photo ops of politicians at charity events where people with disabilities are depicted as victims of tragedy and are pitied. What I sometimes hear are political comments related to costs and how things take time. The social model, and more recently the human rights model, emphasizes that it’s the environmental and attitudinal barriers that prevent people with disabilities from equally participating in communities, even though everyone has the right to equality.

There is also preferable and inclusive language but people still use the outdated ‘handicap’ and other euphemisms.

Ignorance is no excuse in 2024. It’s also unacceptable to personally attack people with disabilities on social media for ‘complaining’ about a lack of access or pointing out attitudinal barriers.

Amherstburg Website AODA Compliance Revisited

Posted on by

SHAMEFUL. This feels like a lack of commitment to accessible goods and services, again.

Brief History

An accessible town website was relegated to year 3 of the town’s first accessibility plan, then listed as a priority for 2005, then 2006 and a 2007 report informed council that the website was compliant with W3C accessibility standards. But it wasn’t, according to an external expert. In 2009, a newly designed website was unveiled and problems continued. In 2011, I commented regarding difficulty navigating the website. In 2014, Amherstburg was invited to hire esolutions when the County redesigned its site to meet accessibility standards; Leamington and Essex had already hired the web design company but Amherstburg declined. According to the town’s site, esolutions redesigned Amherstburg’s site in 2016, although it still had issues.

Deadline Extension Requested

Thousands of dollars and redesigns later, in a September 2020 Report to Council, Administration recommended, and council agreed, to request the Province of Ontario to extend the AODA website compliance January 1, 2021 deadline to at least January 1, 2022 due to COVID-19.

The report claimed COVID was the reason, then administration explained at the council meeting that it was due to third parties. Did no one on council realize the town is also responsible for third party vendors?

Compared to the 2005 AODA (Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act), COVID-19 only existed for a short time but, suddenly, in September 2020, the town needed more time? 15 months more time?

Present Request

Following the January 1, 2022 deadline extension the town requested, a Report to Council for the January 15 Special Council meeting states: ‘The Ministry has approved of this approach and the Town and Ministry have agreed all associated work shall be completed prior to the end of 2024. As such the Town’s work plan expires on December 31, 2024; there are risks that users may encounter barriers in accessing information on Town websites; and the cost to perform a website redesign and refresh not to exceed $70,000, excluding HST.’

My 2020 question stands, why are we not compliant by now?

Related posts:

Town of Amherstburg Requests Website Compliance Deadline Extension

Amherstburg Requests Website Compliance Deadline Extension – The Recommendation.

Amherstburg Requests Website Compliance Deadline Extension – The Resolution

Amherstburg Requests Website Compliance Deadline Extension – The Vote

Amherstburg Requests Website Compliance Deadline Extension – Follow Up Questions to Council

Amherstburg Requests Website Compliance Deadline Extension – Circulation of Resolution

Amherstburg Requests Website Compliance Deadline Extension – Essex County Council Does Not Endorse It

Amherstburg requests Website Compliance Deadline Extension – Third Party Vendors

Amherstburg Mayor’s Levee – Foster Community Spirit?

Posted on by

‘The levee (from the French word lever, meaning “getting up” or “rising”) was traditionally a daily moment of intimacy and accessibility to a monarch or leader, as he got up in the morning.’ Wikipedia

Amherstburg’s Facebook page announced ‘A Mayor’s Levee is a festive event hosted by the Mayor to greet citizens and foster community spirit. It often includes refreshments, entertainment, and a chance to meet local leaders.’

Foster community spirit? Residents are welcome to informally discuss whatever issues they may choose for 3 hours.

Mayor Prue’s 2022 campaign website included, ‘Municipal government affects us all. I am committed to ensuring all citizens to have a say on the issues affecting their lives in Amherstburg. To be fully informed. To participate in review processes. To provide and share their opinions. I believe in local democracy.”

Prue’s campaign brochure’s slogan was: WHEN PEOPLE TALK…Michael Prue LISTENS.

But the Procedural By-law that used to, in part, reflect the intent of local democracy drastically changed in August of 2023 when it was revised and passed unanimously. Residents are no longer allowed to speak to an item unless it’s on council’s agenda or unless council unanimously votes to hear a resident.

Residents must now hope with bated breath that a member of council will raise an issue on their behalf so it may appear on a future agenda and then residents are allowed to speak on it.

But until next council meeting, feel free to take advantage of the invitation to meet local leaders who represent you and ‘foster community spirit’ from 5 pm to 8 pm.

Public Consultation On Parking In Front Of Navy Yard Park Was To Be Held

Posted on by

Nancy Atkinson, on behalf of the Amherstburg Residents Forum, raised three concerns at the June 12 council meeting, one of which was the new no parking sign.

After some discussion, Councillor Pouget made a motion to direct administration to bring back a full report regarding the no parking area in front of the clock at Kings Navy Yard Park.

Mayor Prue asked if there was a seconder and then asked if there was any discussion but then he called on the clerk via zoom.

The clerk wanted to mention that there would need to be some review from an accessibility and risk management side but this motion would allow us to do that. 

Prue stated so the motion helps and all the people will be consulted.

Deputy Mayor Gibb wanted to answer Atkinson.

Listen to the audio.

Administration Report to council for December 11, 2023 council meeting.

Thank Me, Blame Council!

Posted on by

I had been emailing council members since February and urging them to update the procedural by-law and at no point did anyone mention that a review was underway. In September I asked on what date did members of council give direction to admin to update the by-law?

CAO Critchley answered – August 14, 2023. Technically, that was the day council rubber-stamped the by-law so neither council nor the public had any input, unlike other municipalities. As an example, Port Hope where ‘staff will work with all members of Council to gather their individual input on meeting processes and specific elements of the procedural by-law to ensure the recommended draft by-law is reflective of all points of view on Council.’

When I requested an explanation for missing speaking notes from two October 10 delegates, Critchley answered that ‘Both delegates have indicated that they did not have additional materials to provide and both met the requirements of section 9.4 of the Town’s Procedural By-law. While we certainly welcome delegates to share additional information that they may have in advance, if the requirements of the procedural by-law have been met then the Clerk is required to register the delegation.

In fact I believe you had a concern in the past about the requirements for delegates to provide speaking notes and so when the recent revisions to the Procedure By-law were made, we took your concerns into account.’

It wasn’t just my concern. I shared the Centre For Free Expression’s response with council:

I have never heard of a municipality requiring the delegation speaker’s notes, much less the text of the speech, to be submitted ahead of the event. And, I have never heard of a requirement for a copy of the notes or speech text to be submitted with the application to appear. Sometimes when I appear before parliamentary bodies they request a copy of my submission ahead of time so they can distribute it to the committee members and, where there is simultaneous translation, to give a copy to the translators so as to help them. But, this is only after I have been accepted as a speaker and it is not a requirement.
While I feel it is both wrong and bad practice for your municipal council to do as yours is doing, it is not illegal to the best of my knowledge. It is something that should be fought in the court of public opinion.

ames L. TurkDirector, Centre for Free Expression
The Creative School
Toronto Metropolitan University (formerly Ryerson University)

It also wasn’t my only concern. On several occasions I shared my concerns regarding accommodations for persons with disabilities who were unable to be attend meetings and I mentioned comparator municipalities. Ironically, council has considered comparators for staff wages, budgets, and recommending removing the cheque registry from the agenda. Two more inconsistencies.

My comparator chart was attached to the agenda.

Copyright – this information is protected by Canada’s Copyright Act. Request written permission from the burg watch at gmail dot com.

Comparing Cheque Registries

Posted on by

Councillor Pouget campaigned ‘to regain the loss of trust by many of our taxpayers.’ Following her motion to reinstate accounts payable on public agendas, council and administration discussed it for about fifteen minutes at the December 5, 2022 council meeting. Read the full post: Accounts Payable On Agenda: A Matter of Trust. Deputy Mayor Gibb was the lone dissenting vote.

Now the ‘cheque registry pilot program‘ is on the November 27 agenda, although the motion to place the cheque registries on the agenda from about a decade ago was never rescinded or reconsidered.

Amherstburg population 21,936 (2016 census).

Comparing other municipalities that post the item to their agendas:

Southgate population 7190

Wasaga Beach population 20,675

St. Catharines population 140,370

New Tecumseth population 41,439

Open Air – If They Vote How Will They Vote?

Posted on by

The Open Air Report is on tonight’s meeting agenda and I predict another majority vote in favour, not necessarily a 4-3 vote.

Everyone on council knows about the accessibility issues because everyone is aware of the number of times I complained, despite the rebuttals; but now the survey results indicate more people have noted the accessibility and parking concerns.

Councillor Crain: I’ll start with the sole opposition to this survey. In August, Crain said he can’t grasp why Open Air specifically; they’ve done an Open Air survey for residents and businesses so he felt a survey just on Open Air seems to be wasting staff time.

CAO Critchley confirmed in an email that they have surveyed visitors and the businesses inside and outside the footprint but not a resident wide survey.

On February 22, Crain asked staff, hasn’t the past Council already looked at ways to refine open air and that’s why some of the barricades were moved in closer? This feels a bit redundant to me if this has already been looked at by council. And from last night and from what we’ve been hearing, it’s pretty clear that the format is great. But based on my understanding, council’s already looked at this.

Crain was part of the team that created the THRIVE Open Air white paper; from the THRIVE website, ‘We believe that it should be a permanent summer feature.’ 

On March 13, Crain said he didn’t even think Open Air should have been a topic of discussion. He also thought they shouldn’t even be discussing this every year because eventually it’s going to be nothing.

On September 16, I asked Crain if he considered declaring a conflict of interest for Open Air discussions involving the event itself and the survey? No response.

As a candidate, in answer to one of the burg watch 2022 campaign questions to the candidates asking if they will remove barriers during Open Air weekends, Crain said yes. He voted in favour.

Councillor McArthur: has happily and consistently championed Open Air. As council’s rep to the Accessibility Advisory Committee, I expected he would advocate to remove barriers. He spewed out the statistics from an admin report on the number of parking spaces within a six-minute walking radius. ‘If there are persisting issues with accessibility, let’s work collaboratively to address them in consultation with the Town’s Accessibility Advisory Committee.’ But he’s on the committee. He voted in favour.

Deputy Mayor Gibb: wears a few hats: business owner, chamber of commerce member, family member, elected official but he publicly admitted he’s a huge fan. While he emailed, as Deputy Mayor, that he was ‘proud to say that I did complete the ADOA training that was offered to all members of council and I hope to put what I learned into practice not only in my “municipal life” but also in my personal life. And then he said, Open Air makes the downtown more accessible for people with in at least in wheelchairs because his mother-in-law and father-in-law both live at Richmond Terrace and he’s personally pushed a wheelchair from Richmond Terrace downtown. He voted in favour.

Mayor Prue: has given a few speeches at council meetings about being in the legislature when the AODA was introduced decades ago. He stated he has never seen any problem with access and cited his wife as Chair of the Accessibility Committee. I have discussed it with her, she has never once said that there was any accessibility problem brought to that committee or anyone on the committee. He acknowledged one complainant, but he doesn’t necessarily agree with what’s being said; so it is accessible.

Prue asked council to find it in their hearts to compromise with the other side; he broke the tie vote in favour.

Councillor Pouget: has consistently acknowledged the town’s obligation to remove barriers that prevent people with disabilities from equally participating in the community.

Councillor Courtney: has also acknowledged the importance of accessibility, removing barriers and considering the interests of the whole community.

Councillor Allaire: considered pros and cons and seemed to want to compromise in favour of a shorter time frame.